My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:22:30 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:19:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991(#8)HARDCOVER REVIEW CONTINUED be reviev/ed by the Planning Commission.Kelley asked Council what policy will interim.be in effect in theCallahan suggested leaving t.-.e pre-existing Ordinance as is (v(/hich states that any weed control material, plastic or fabric, <br />is considered as hardcover) until an appropriate amendment is <br />recommended by Planning Commission and adopted by Council. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to rescind <br />the Ordinance relating to non—woven fabric until such time that <br />an Ordinance Amendment is drafted and adopted. All voted aye. <br />Motion passed. <br />Gaffron noted that in light of the action previously taken <br />by Council, he knows of several people that have installed <br />non-woven fabric on their property. <br />Council stated that they could foresee no problem with the <br />existing situations. Staff was asked to continue urging people <br />to use the fabric, as opposed to plastic, but with an <br />understanding that during the interim period of fine tuning the <br />ordinance amendment, the fabric will be considered hardcover. <br />OTHER <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she would be meeting with Betsy <br />Swartwood, Mayor of the City of Long Lake, to discuss some of the <br />issues of mutual concern for both cities. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT: <br />(#9/STUBBS BAY SEWER <br />Bernhardson presented Council with information pertaining to <br />the issues of financing the project, further engineering v.’ork <br />that should be done on the project, and the areas to be included <br />in the project. He said, "The City could opt to contribute a <br />certain amount to the cost of project, which would defray the <br />cost to the individual residents. However, there is really no <br />way of knowing what degree of financial involvement on the City's <br />behalf v/ill make the project acceptable to the residents. VJould <br />the City consider a request from the residents to defray the <br />project costs by 50%? The City could either determine a certain <br />percentage of participation and ask the residents if >_hat v/ould <br />be acceptable, or ask the residents for input as to what they <br />would consider to be an acceptable level of City participation. <br />Sutler stated that it would be difficult for the City to <br />indicate its v/illingness to psy a certain percent of the project <br />costs, because the project costs are not known at this time. <br />- 8 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.