Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JULY 18, 1994 <br />(#2) #1941 LEE AND WANDA nSCHBACH - 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:13 TO 7:58 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Fischbach and John Spencer, their consultant, were present. <br />Mabusth explained the application had been withdrawn from the June Planning Commission <br />meeting to allow applicants more time to prepare for review. Under previous ownership, this <br />property was involved with a variance application, portions of which were after-the-fact, dealing <br />with the removal of a concrete patio and replacement with a grade level deck at 144 s.f. As part <br />of the approval condition the owner was to remove plastic beneath extensive crushed rock <br />landscaping areas. The owners at that time refused and never proceeded with plans for a <br />balcony. At this time the present owners propose removal of the upper level three season porch, <br />and the construction of a two story addition located approximately 21 ’ from the edge of the pond <br />which is now considered part of the main lake of Lake Minnetonka. The 3’ upper level deck <br />will be located 18’ from the edge of the pond. The expansion of an entry addition is also <br />proposed which does not require setback variances but there are hardcover excesses in the 75- <br />250 ’ setback area. Major reductions in hardcover are proposed in the 75-250 ’ setback area. Lot <br />coverage exists at 14.2% and is proposed at 15.04% requiring a variance of .04%. Chair <br />Schroeder asked whether the reductions were coming from plastic removal. Mabusth conHrmed <br />noting that all the plastic would be removed. <br />John Spencer described the proposed plan and stated the deck was achially being make into a <br />structure. <br />Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. Mr. and Mrs. Carl Johnson, 3105 <br />North Shore Drive, who are neighbors, stated the proposal would be a nice improvement. <br />Chair Schroeder explained that hardcover regulations are in place to protect Lake Minnetonl^ <br />and voiced concern with the large addition of hardcover close to the Lake. Removing the plastic <br />counts as a credit towards removal but actually it should never have been placed within the area. <br />He asked what will be done to the area after the removal of plastic. Mr. Fischback said the <br />landscape plan had not been completed but grass or flowers would be put in. The majority of <br />the lot is in a no build zone which limit.' the amount of space with which to build on but the <br />proposed improvements will finally offer a view of the lake and make the house more enjoyable.