Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />: \ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ® 1994ortQfon^ <br />DATE: August 2, 1994 <br />ITEM NO.; if <br />■PPUjjLj'Department ApproTal: <br />^ta■M Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />TMc BuiMing Jk Zoning Administraior <br />Admiiiistrator Reviewed:Agenda Sectioa: <br />Zoning <br />Item Deecri|i #1945 Robert and Velma Wolff, 4450 Forest Lsjx Landing > Variances - <br />Resolution <br />Add lal Exhibits <br />H - Amended Hardcover Plan <br />Review of Hardcover as Amended by Plannbig C • I I I I ( I kX’* .1,1 V. » . I M M . I I M ’ 1 • J <br />Section 10.22, Subd. 2 <br />A. 0-75’ setback area = 3,825 s.f. <br />Allowed s 0 <br />Existing « 26 s.f. <br />B 75-250’ setback area = 6,761 s.f. <br />Allowed » 1,690 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing * 3,513 s.f. or 51.9% <br />Amended proposal - 3,080 s.f. or 45.5% <br />Hardcover re^tion of 433 s.f. or 6.4% <br />Brief Review of Applkati <br />The applicants request approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for a 10’ x 14’ <br />three season porch to be installed within the area of an existing lakeside deck. The existing deck <br />is 26’ in front of the average lakeshore setback line. The intensification of structure located 6.5’ <br />from side lot line requires approval of a side setback variance. <br />The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors to either the north or <br />south. The :>tnicture will have a minimal impact on the residence to the south side. The <br />residence to the north will not see the porch as it is located at applicant’s southeast side of the <br />residence completely out of the view of the residence of the property to the north. <br />The T’esidence was constnicted prior to the current lakeshore/shoreland standards.