Laserfiche WebLink
oporatlonr, .nd tho lcqiti».te interests of loci governments in <br />regul.tinq loc.l toning rn.tt.rs.* PM-1 1 22. Aft.r w.ighmg <br />loci f.d.r.1. .nd .».teur Interests, the rcc Issued . ruling th.t <br />h.e . lls,lt«l preeuptlv. effect on loc.l regul.tlons. Stt »«»-l ' <br />24 The feder.l court, th.t h.ve .ddre.swl this ruling h.ve upheld <br />Its pr.e»ptlv. effect. 8M. EVdnt Y. .JQinl Qt CBUntlt <br />aaalxA. »»♦ r-w TH«m« y. Ct«-fll <br />,.v...de P.rh. K^. 27* r.2d 11.7, 11..-.9 («th Clr. 1..6) (P« <br />curiawy. <br />court, .pplylng PllB-1 heve discerned two me.ns by which PRB-l <br />>i.y preempt . loc.l ordln.nc. First, the loci regul.tlon s.y be <br />pro«pt«i on It. f.c. The city's toning ordlnsnc. doe. not <br />conflict on Its f.ce with PM-1 boc.u.e it neither bene nor lepo.es <br />.n unv.rylng height restriction on .eeteur rsdlo 'j* <br />-- - - - seed of county r. Bupp. .72, ^ <br />Colo. 1..0X V. City of EdMndB. «71 F. Supp. 1270, <br />(W.D. Wash. <br />Saconde PRB-l also praaapta a zonlfvg ordinanca that a city has <br />not eppll«« in • -nner th.t r..«>n.bly sccoeecdste. «»t.ur <br />co«unlc.tlon.. UM BCBM. ».♦ •* HirHIlUn V. <br />refusal to si-clfy . height below which loci governeent. could not <br />regul.te. end Insteed d«:l.red th.t -loc.l r«fuUtlons which <br />involve pl.cos.nt, screening, or height of .ntenn.. b..ed on <br />he.lth, s.f.ty, or .esthetic con.id.r.tlon. oust be cr.fted to <br />.ccoeeod«t. re.sonebly .i«t.ur coeeunlc.t Ions, .nd to represent the <br />elnlBue pr.ctle.ble regul.tlon to .ccoopllsh the loci suthortty s <br />la^ltiaata purpoaa." PRB-l % 25- <br />..gu.n«"'V.’ti ;V« ■''■,^4 ”tn <br />Riiiiasi ,y4. City <br />Clr <br />- -