Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />II <br />& <br />t ■ <br />K ■i:., <br />|c <br />i,:> <br />|h:,,m <br />k <br />\ <br />i‘ <br />'-■ <br />antenna from 35 to 70 fee* Evan grtater heights would <br />provide stiN greater communications distances unoer the <br />same conditions <br />The radiation angle of the lowest lo&e for a hori­ <br />zontal antenna above the ground may be determined <br />mathematicaHy: <br />$ > sin-I 0.2S <br />where <br />9 « the wave angle or radiation angle <br />h a the anter^na height above ground in <br />w»v9i9ngths (see Table 2) <br />In short, the higher the horizontal antenna, the lower <br />is the lowes* looe of the pattern. Therefore, the higher <br />an HF antenna can be placed, the farther it will provide <br />effective communications because of the resulting lower <br />radiation angle. This is true for any horizontal antenna <br />Electrical Charaderisttcs of HF Antennas <br />As mentioned previously, a dipole antenna, when <br />viewed from one end of the cortductor. radiates an equal <br />amount of power in all directions. The plotted radiation <br />pattern is a perfect circle, if the dipole is vertical, this <br />circle represMts the azimuth coverage, with an equal <br />amount of power radiated m every compass direction. <br />For point-to-point communications, however, it is bene­ <br />ficial to concentrate the radiated energy into a beam <br />which is aimed toward a single distant point. An analogy <br />can be made by comparirtg the light emanating from a <br />bare electric lamp to that from an autorm^ile headlight. <br />For illuminating a distant point, the headlight is far more <br />effective. <br />Antennas designed to concentrate the radiated <br />energy into a beam are called beam antennas For a <br />fixed amount of trartsmitter power fed to the transmitting <br />anMnna. beam antennas provide increased sigrtal <br />strength at a distant receiver. In radio communications, <br />the use of a beam antenna is also beneficial during <br />reception, because the antenna pattern for transmission <br />IS the same as for reception. A beam antenna helps to <br />reiect signals from unwanted directions, and in effect <br />boosts the strength of signals received from the desired <br />direction. <br />The increase in signal or field strength which a beam <br />antenna offers is frequently referenced to a dipole <br />antenna by a term called gam. Gam is commonly <br />expressed in decibels. One type of beam antenna is a <br />Vagi, named after one of its Japanese inventors. <br />Different varieties of Yagi antennas exist, each having <br />somewhat different characteristics. Many antennas <br />erected for television reception are a form of multi­ <br />element Yagi beam. <br />Subsequent discussions in this paper refer to a <br />3-element Yagi array, one having a driven element, a <br />parasitic director and a parasitic reflector. The parasitic <br />elements are not fed any power directly; instead they are <br />excited through mutual coupling to the driven element, <br />and in turn also radiate power. Each parasitic element <br />is spaced 0.2 wavelength from the driven element, and <br />r-o <br />Fig a Compmar cslculalaa azUnuth-plaiie ra diaW en <br />panel <br />Nne). <br />Fig 7—Compyier-calculated eievation-plaiie or vertical- <br />profile patiem of a horiaomal Vagi arr^, solid Mne. and <br />for a campariaen dipole, broken line. These panama <br />are those seen from the ends of the alemerMs with the <br />antennas in free apace. <br />the theoretical gam of this array, determined through <br />computer analysis, is 7.2 dB over a dipole. This means <br />that for the same transmitter power, the effective radiated <br />power of the Yagi in its favored direction is 5.2 times that <br />of the dipole in the same direction. The theoretical front- <br />to-back ratio of the Yagi antenna is 12 dB. meaning the <br />power radiated in its forward direction is. 15.7 times that <br />radiated in the opposite direction. Values for a practical <br />antenna of this type are quite close to theordticai. <br />Computer-calculated radiation patterns for the <br />horizontal Yagi array are presented m Figs 6 and 7. <br />Fig 6 shows the azimuth plane, the response in various