07-25-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1; ■ii ;^,r. ■ r?-" \r< ; 'V' ir Ib'^, rt- '•*** 9T- K t*-’ H: i. ■ e'-' f'i' : s ' II'if I E^-r' • P- ^?1V ‘ r,i l^■ It ; f. iT i. y Request for Council Act! pm2cf3 hOy 21. 1994 Zonii« File #1913 ill I - I II'I*imkations Effectiveness*1 - Afticle Entitled "Aims Heiglit and O I • Specifkations - Unhreml Towers K-Neigtibon’ Petition of Approval L - Before Uniied Stties Cowts of Appeals for the 8th Circuit M - David MacMlIan Letter to Applicant Agnehif to 73* Height N > Robert Miicliell Letter. Attorney for David MacMillan. 6/20/94 O - Covcnaat Not To Sue. David MacMillan P - Hold Harmless Agreement Whitney MacMillan Q • Stamuoo Memo 7/lSm R • Chy Attorney's Drafts of Hold Harmless Agreements and Covenant S • PlamiiM Coimnissioo Minutes 4/18^ AppUcant has an independent tower/antenna stiuctuie at an 83* height without the benefit of a building permit and the required conditional use permit. The anaemia, tower and base were installed by applicant. The strucnne was observed by the inspectors sometime in October of 1993. A^icant was advised of the need to apply for a conditional use permit. Review Exhibit E. it is both the applicant's and owner's preference to have the structure at 73* height approved at a 32* setback requiring a setback variance. A copy of applicant*s amateur radio license has been submitted confirming the use as solely for private and hobby use. Applicant resides in resideiiee on property as required by ordinance. The use is subordinaae to or accessory to the priiKipal residential um. The propel is owned by Whitney MacMillan and Mr. MacMillan has sifoed the application as owner. Review Exhibits D. F and K. the property to the immediate cast is owned by David MacMillan. Please note the petition was not been signed by David MacMillan. It is David MacMillan*s property to the east that receives the most impact as structure would be located 32* ftom his west lot line. Review Exhibits M and O. smee the Planning Commiasioo review. David MacMillan hu submitted written confirmation that he would approve a maximum antenna height of 73* at the present location. The applicant has advised that he would agree to altering the antenna to meet the 73* height requested by David MacMillan. Mr. Ttuchinski's tower could be placed on the property meeting all required setimeks if it was moved to the higher elevations to the north and west. Placement of the structure on the higher elevations would have an increased visual impact on all surrounding properties. In feet, the more nothem location would have a greater impaa <mi the David MacMillan properQr than it would in its presem I m i ;I