My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
07-25-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 9:50:04 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 9:43:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING HELD ON JUNE 20, 1994 <br />PAGE: 1 <br />REOUESTER: CAROLE <br />ANGE - <br />/30/93 <br />VALUATION <br />0.00*» <br />PLAN REVIEW <br />0.00 <br />0.00 <br />0.00 <br />0.00* <br />0.00** <br />PAGE: 1 <br />REQUESTER: CAROLE <br />ROLL <br />staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning <br />Administrator Michael Gaffron. and City Recorder Barbara Anderson. Chair Schroeder called <br />the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />m) #1933 TANDEM PROPERTIES, 2645/3025 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />PI ’^LIMINARY SUBDIVISION - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Dick Putnam, Jim Deanonic. and Mark Gronberg were present representing Tandem Properties. <br />Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Atfidavit of Publication were on <br />nie with the City. Mabusth reviewed the plans for the second phase of the development. e <br />noted that the Corps of Engineers had asked that the filling be reduced on lots 17 and 18 and <br />the applicant has requested that the Corps reconsider their amended proposal. The Co^s te <br />the amended proposal was reasonable and would present the proposal before the Board. She <br />discussed the drainage plans and the runoff impacts on the adjacent properties. <br />Smith inquired about the drainage beneath the Luce Line Trail and Mark Gronberg responded <br />that they were creating a larger holding pond on their property to reduce the runoff to the south. <br />He stated the culvert goes beneath both the Luce Line Trail and the adjacent horse trail. <br />The issue of the outlot being designated a sacred site was discussed. This land will be plac'^.d <br />in the public Jurisdiction as it was felt to be more fitting than to have it within the jurisdictmn <br />of a homeowners association. Jim Deanonie stated that the Restoration Society was considering <br />moving the barn to a site close to Valley Fair where it would be reconstructed along with othci <br />vintage barns. He believed they should have a determination on whether this barn will he <br />selected within the next month or so. <br />Mabusth reviewed the plans for the Coffin portion of the development, ^he ‘"eyewed the <br />designated wetlands on the property and discussed the lot sumdards. She noted that ots m <br />17 were considered back lots. Mabusth outlined tne proposed location for the interior trails <br />the project. Dick Putnam stated they would put woodchips down tor a <br />intentions were to give the development residents access to the Luce Line trail. He believed mat <br />wood chips on the surface would be less intrusive, and noted that it would be left as it presa <br />exists, with perhaps the addition of wood chips. He noted that this would be a private trai oi <br />the residents only, and not a public trail. <br />Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing. Mike Bursall asked if Outlot C, the privau. <br />driveway would ever serve more than the proposed two lots. Mabusth responded t ai it wo. . <br />only serve the two lots, and if they wanted more lots it would have to come back before tit- <br />Planning Commission for a replat and he would be notilied.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.