07-25-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

m■ M-i■■■•: •■vi;r; r«:’’ Request for Council Acti pege 3 of 4 July 21, 1994 Zoniot Ftk #1938 't> lEMjt 1 < IDuriat the June review of the appikreioo, the Planmii| Coouiiisskm wu most concerned with the hnpact of the new comtnaction upon the Muff are* end required that the amended application show a minimum sellwck of 10* ftora the top of the Muff defined at the 982 etevatkm. Review Brfiaik c, the dedicai ed right-of-way of Riifc Luie is 80* ad|aoem to the street lot line of this property. Plamung Commissioa MemM*s fell that they would prefer to grant a more ii street setback vacianoe so that stnicture v^aild be moved away from Muff. The proposed structure will not encroach any cloeer to the i.aveled right-of-way than the existing strucoire at 42*. Applicants* hardcover hm been reduced ^iom 29.7% to 26.4% by reducing grade level deck areas and the moving of the structure cloeer .o the road reducing hardcover from driveway improve menn, compare Exhibiis H avsd K. ThePfamniiv appHcamhad VC stn recommended approval of the applicatioo as amended finding that ivcs of the naaniiv Conmiission at their June meeiiiv which was le to* cloaer to the road and hardcover was not to exceed 26-27%. I ('-■ * I I - *• t I r'Ktrm Wi ■mM .ill Ml .* ’ji 2. 3. 4. 1. The severe slope and Muff areas of the property have limited the building envMope 10 30% of the total lot aie9. The comer of the attached garage will be located 6* from the street lot line and 42* ftom the traveled road. The existing residence is located 42* from the traveled. Dedicated right-of-way for Park Lane is 80*. The City requires a 50* right-of- way for residential roadways whhin the City. Park Lane will never be developed at an 80* width. All runoff from new development will be directed towards street and away from the steep slopes at the lakeside of the residence. Hardcover within the 0-75* setback area has been r i from 3.5% to 1.8%. 6. The proposed improvement to diis property would be consistent with the existing iBiprovemems of the lakeshore residences to the east and west of the property. The Planning Coounissioa leconunended approval of the hardcover, street setback and Muff setback variances proposed in the amended plans, subject to the following conditions: All existing hardcover inq>rovemenis scheduled for removal must be c prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. •JM •ileted I i '.Mr.*!'.:r:;‘ - ►v'*'r ..•< ».;v