Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Ms. Ceil Stranss <br />May 29, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />B. <br />_ a lock box at the shoreline was <br />The concept oroperties with steep -ats at <br />developed specifically t P ^ area inlan- of the <br />the lakeshore and allow boating equipment such as <br />OHWL. The intent was ‘» *“°*i“°Vtc. to be stored rather <br />life jackets, stairway after each outing, <br />than lugged up and “g*Vuetion 10' back from the OHWL <br />in such areas, '“"'.tion into the hillside, it was <br />SltirtdneVtheTtSuld be less impact on the sborelands by <br />not requiring a setback. <br />C. <br />orono has specifically adopted moryes«^^^^^ forsr.r.i ssKr <br />‘.Vi <br />potential for b 250 * ^ n ^ allows a structure less <br />back from the shoreline and ^ l/lO the footprint area,than half the height and less than 1/10 the «o p <br />but located at the shoreline From a vis <br />standpoint, the loo'' mental qrading impacts into <br />area* <br />^ . .pSie.4-rtVB the city of Orono again requestsBased on the above factors, the ^ water oriented accessory <br />flexibility for lock boxes as a 1®“ ,^;"P»rf larger water <br />structure while concurrently pt -ilnificantly higher vlsu.-.l and oriented accessory structures with a significantly nign <br />environmental impact on the lake. <br />Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have further questions regarding <br />our request for flexibility. <br />Asst!*Planning 6 Zoning Administrator <br />MPG/ch <br />cc:Ed PickJeanne A. Mabusth, Building 4 Zoning Adm. <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />City Council <br />4A <br />.e <br />\