Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Request for Council Action continued <br />page 3 of 4 <br />June 9. 1994 <br />#1914 George Apfrtebaum, 4109 Highwood Road <br />C •Property Owners’ List <br />D •Neighbor ’s Acknowledgement Forms <br />E -Average Lakeshoie Setback Line <br />F •Existing Survey <br />G - <br />- M ♦ I. <br />Existing Topographic <br />H-1-2 Lot Covenge Facts <br />I •Staff Sketch-Top of Bhiff <br />J-1-3 Karrlcover-Exis <br />1)Key <br />2)0-75* <br />3)75-250 ’ <br />K-1-3 Hardcover-Pr <br />1)Key <br />2)0-75* <br />3)75-250* <br />Elevations <br />i <br />L - <br />M - Floor Plans <br />Brief Review or AppUadi <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the multiple variance application at their April and <br />May meetings. Improvements consist of a 24* x 24* attached garage, a second story, a main <br />floor addition involving the enclosure of the existing 18* x 18* deck, a 6’ x 18* addition at the <br />southeast comer and an approximate 18’ x 10' deck at the lakeside. The improvements result <br />in an increase of 1.008 s.f. of structural coverage requiring a lot coverage variance of 267.25 <br />s.f. or 1.6%. The existing house does not meet the required setbacks fhmi the street which <br />requires setback approvals for the second story. The existing detached garage shall be replaced <br />by an attached garage that would be located 9*. The original detached prage was 3Vi’ from the <br />street lot line. The original garage was 3’ from the side lot line and is now proposed at 7V6* <br />still requiring a side setback variance. Review Exhibit E. note all improvements will be located <br />well behind the average lakesbore setback line. <br />Review Exhibit 1. Staff has sketched the lop of the bhiff at the lakeside of the property. <br />All improvemenis will encroach the required 30’ sedMck from the top of bhiff but none will <br />impact the bhiff as all alterations will te set back from the top. In the original proposal, a <br />portion of a walkout was shown but was denied by the Planning Commission as they would not <br />consider any disturbance of the bluff. The a|q>licam was advised of the special standards <br />required per code for all construction within a bluff area, noting special erosion control and <br />_