My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
06-13-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 4:22:31 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 4:19:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
planning commission minutesCITY OF ORONO <br />NOVEMBER 15, 1993 (P- <br />Chairman Schtoeder inquired if the City would <br />" ;"^e^"ontg''Mfyor Ed^Cailahan stated that the Council was not in favor of the <br />retoning, and that v/as the extent of the drscussion. <br />Mr. Terry Forbord, Lundgren j'“^ ® why the retoning <br />Concerns. He introduced Mr. John a Certified Wetland <br />Director of Land Development for Lundgr and Ken Adolph, a Principal Engineer with <br />Biologist to discuss the wetland rnttigation ^ ^^3^^ iried to provide <br />Schoell and Madson in Minnetonka. Mr. Forbord those of other <br />distinctive features in their . ^ the supply of available land diminishes. <br />John Uban showed exhibits that were type^of *^eve?o^^^ He diLussed the <br />was important to the City of fenvisioned in the City's <br />proposed zoning density and noted t should be considered. Among these is theComprehensive Plan, there are reasons why t should be cons.ae^ <br />fact that the school is expanding and the chore P ^ J . ,_,g g^g^gd they believe this <br />been constructed on property adjacent to * ® ^ reviewed the PUD zoning <br />project would balance the residential and c u .jg p that a municipal sewer system is <br />designation and discussed the development idea and <br />needed for development of the property. ,__.jK|p He discussed the buffering for the <br />mo;:cra7d'.heTdinrnce%r°eb^ busy roadways surrounding the site and the <br />ddj^ent land uses as being compatible with the proposed zoning. <br />1 t . _ _-------A ^ t I <br />He discussed tne compe..:>a.u.y.....7^ \ ^ch would mean that two acres or <br />they will create new wetlands at a ratio of 2 to , illustrated where the wetlands <br />we!Iand will be created for every one acre »',?ees anregetation within those <br />are located on the site and described '' tiands have been subject to agricultural tillage <br />wetland areas. He stated that most of the ^ considered to be "pristine" <br />in the past, depending on the amount of rain ' ® variance to allow the wetlands <br />wetlands. He asked the Planning Commission to consider a varian. <br />to be modified. <br />Ken Adolph. Sbboell and Mad^^ b” extended i^m the aTea, and noted <br />septic systems. He stated that sanitary sewe nattern which could economically <br />ren:rdV;—
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.