My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
06-13-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 4:22:31 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 4:19:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning FUe #1885 <br />November 12, 1993 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />3 Review Exhibit N. Two alternate development plans for an expanded Highway 12 <br />corridor along County Road 6 will impact this property. Does this influence your <br />decision? <br />4.The City planned for a total of 300-450 units of future development where existing and <br />proposed uses of City, the school and now Mn/DOT will limit the development of those <br />units. Does this influence your decision? <br />Should the City's decision be inlluenced by the need to make payment for certain public <br />faciliues installed and planned for the servicing of these umts? <br />Planning Commission members should be prepared to make a recommendation to the <br />Council with the necessar>' supponive findings. <br />5. <br />Review of PUD Development Plan <br />Proposed average lot size = 44,010 s.f. <br />Exclusive of road and open space outlet <br />Smallest lot size is 17,200 s.f. <br />Largest lot size is 88.970 s.f. <br />= 28.539 s.f. <br />Proposed building setbacks <br />30’ front yard setback ^ r> • <br />50’ rear yard setback, 100’ along County Road 6 and Willow Dnve <br />10’ side yard setback, 30’ adjacent to Willow Dnve <br />26 ’ to wetland <br />Lot Configuration Issues <br />The R-l A or one acre zone would require 35' ‘'reet. 30' rear and ID' side setback^ TOe <br />proposed setbacks work for this PUD. They appear to function for this lot ^yout. Staff sees <br />TO problem Note the 30' side setback of the two acre zomng dismcl was called out for the 1^ <br />along Willow Lots 1 and 8. As already stated, the lots along County Road 6 have 100 <br />setbacks provikng not only a buffet to the northem residential lots but aim to the ^sy “U J <br />road Some of the residential units do not meet the required 26 setback from »he adjacent <br />wetland. Filling for the building pads is aUo located within recommends <br />that the 26 ’ setback be maintained for all land alterations and structural setbacks. <br />Grading, Drainage, Wetland Areas and Hood Plain <br />Note all building pads are lined along the <br />«tion^h"ldbgTads raised 8' to bring fill dang-.ously close to the weUand area. <br />It is doubtful whether four lots can be developed in the area.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.