Laserfiche WebLink
upon, ot ovet the Jerome or Lindell Property -ith respect to such <br />road. <br />COONT TWO <br />(Adverse Claim) <br />29.paragraphs 1-28 are restated, realleged and incorporated <br />by reference. <br />30. City claims an interest in the Jerome Property and the <br />Lindell Property adverse to that of Jercme and Lindell. <br />31. Pursuant to Minnesota Chapter 559, Plaintiffs are <br />entitled to a judgment determining the adverse claim by City and <br />the rights of the parties. <br />32. Plaintiffs Jerome are entitled to a judgment that the <br />Jerome Property is free and clear of any lien, interest or <br />encumbrance by City for, or in connection with, the alleged <br />public road. <br />33. Plaintiffs Lindell are entitled to a judgment that the <br />Lindell Property is free and clear of any lien, interest or <br />encumbrance by City for, or in connection with, the alleged <br />public road <br />COUNT THREE <br />(Permanent Injunction) <br />34. Paragraphs 1-34 are restated, realleged and incorporated <br />by reference. <br />35. City claims that it has the right to enter upon the <br />Disputed Property, to exercise control over the gates installed <br />by Plaintiffs, and to control access over the Disputed Property <br />to Lake Minnetonka. <br />- 5 -