My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-23-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:58:22 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1919 <br />April 14. 1994 <br />Pace 2 <br />5.Principal Stnicturc Side and Street Setbacks f <• <br />(Since the existing detached garage is proposed to now be attached and roof raised 4 -5 . <br />variances are required for its existing substandard location.) Variance <br />G«agc Side Se.bock: ^ <br />Garage Street Setback: 30 21.8 »- ^7^) <br />Ordinance Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) <br />6.a^rwler^curre^^ technical definition, top of bluff based on a mid-lot cross-section is 2 <br />lakeward from proposed decks) <br />Required Setback from Top ot Bluff: 30 <br />Proposed; 2 <br />• NOTE: Under the proposed zoning amendment, no variance would be <br />required in this case . . . <br />Ordinance Section 10.56. Subd. 3.2; Subd. 16(C) <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - .Application <br />B - Letter of Request 4/l4>94 <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Property Owners List <br />E - Proposed Site Plan <br />F - Pre-existing Site Plan <br />G - Hardcover Calculations <br />H - Building Plans <br />1 - Bluff Cross Section by Staff <br />J - Photos Submitted by Applicant <br />K - Documentation from Previous Grading Approval - Resolution #1079 <br />Discussion <br />The Bu.ev residence was destroyed in a fire on December !8. 1993. On Decemter 30Ui the <br />on February 25th. <br />In the ensuing weeks the building inspector called out a number of problems with the proposal <br />relaKd to building height and grading plans. It was the initial intent of the property owners to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.