My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 3 <br />May 4, 1994 <br />#1912 Tim Hillman, 400 Leaf Street <br />be removed before a building permit could be issued. Review Exhibits E and F, the conceptual <br />elevations of the structure depicting a 2'/^-story structure would not appear to present a height <br />problem. Applicant is advised that teight of suucture is determined from existing elivations and <br />4’ of fill may require alterations in design. <br />The applicant advised the Planning Commission that he would be responsible for the <br />building of the struen-re. The Planning Commission advised that all construction would be <br />subject to Section 12.05, Subdivisions 1 and 2 of the Municipal Code dealing with time <br />constraints on residential construction. <br />At the time of the Plaiming Commission review, the applicant advised that there were <br />no formal easements granted to the property to the east. If an easement existed, the area of the <br />access casement would have to be deducted from the total lot area. Review Page 1 of the staff <br />memo of April 14, 1994. Note lot coverage was proposed at 14.1%. The iwighbor to the east <br />who is in complete support of applicartt ’s improvement project, advises that there is a 20’ <br />easemem in favor of their property (review Exhibit J). The reduction in lot area creates a lot <br />coverage excess now proposed at 16.1 %. Revised lot coverage facts are reviewed as follows: <br />Lot area = 36,239 s.f. <br />Adjusted lot area = 32,899 s.f. (reduction of 3,340 s.f. of driveway casement) <br />Allowed = 4,934.85 s.f. or 15% <br />Existing = 3,069.3 s.f. or 9.32% <br />Proposed = 5,298.9 s.f. or 16.1% (2,229.6 s.f. of additional struemre. This includes <br />a 26* X 6’ upper level deck on south side of structure.) <br />The application now would require side and street setback variances and a lot coverage <br />variance of 1.1%. <br />The majority of the Planning Commission approved the application for the side ami street <br />setback variances as proposed, subject to the following conditions: <br />1.That applicant shall adhere to time limits for construction as set forth in <br />Municipal Code. <br />2.The exterior of the garage to the immediate rear of the ctructure shall be repaired <br />so as to match the exterior construction materials of new residence and that this <br />improvement is to be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of <br />Occupancy for new residence.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.