Laserfiche WebLink
M; <br />TWnrfHM^ : 3 :r *f^ *^-r a’, • <br />«:r*,r?^ •» •‘- •W:Q^4wwobjV<!‘‘®’>» ‘® "’•■’'•'l*"'?.v''Kri'“'4i -?J^4«isX '^It thb’appllebtlon Involvtd • IJ <br />.:i; J; ?.;^? U i-'‘»hs:3';;^Mid. ^ ho®«» «'! • »4’ *”;i*i'‘ 5 '‘’.1je attached to an ,axl«tln.d|-vwock slwp <br />'• . v*'f ' <br />km <br />#773 RICHARD ZUCKMAN <br />3995 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />T - <br />Kwilev noted that he’could not approve a hardcoj^^ <br />. ^2 J«%hin the 75* - 250’ setback area and.atked <br />^^e';pp^canV"wha^• lyp^ o^^r.deoff he could «ke. <br />R®'0 <br />Luesse stated that he could remove the root cellar. <br />Kelley moved to approve a side setback vjrJjnce for <br />.additions to house and detached garage based on the <br />following findings:,,f~. <br />1. Location of house and other improvements on lot. <br />2. Location of retaining wall In street yard. <br />3. No additional land available. <br />Approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />1 The extension into the lakeshore <br />side may not exceed the substandard setback o <br />5.5’ . <br />Turnaround provided on site. <br />Firewall construction on north side of detached <br />garage per building inspector's approval. <br />V :l <br />4, No future variances granted to this property <br />Slme seconded. Vote: Ayes (5)» Nays (0). <br />Richard Zuckman and Scott Mann were present. Howard <br />Johnson of Concordia Street was present. <br />zuckman noted that he was not ,*?!![ <br />conditional use permit but a renewal of the existing <br />conditional use permit. <br />Sime asked if the building Inspector had <br />the buildings. <br />ever looked at <br />Mabusth stated that he had <br />whenever a building permit was Issued. <br />that at some future date the structures will be deemed <br />unlnhabl^ibl«. <br />I