05-09-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MivuTBS OF CT FumimR; coMUSsioa Etno JMIAR? 1€» 199Q 0 ZOMIMG FILE #14S7-SCH«1IDKR COBTIW- Mabusth said conditional use pernits usually are not trritten in that Banner# but could be. Schneider said that he would prefer to have the conditional perait run as long as the Art Center leases the property. Mabusth suggested reviewing the property every two years, Cohen suggested tabling this ssatter until the next neeting) to provide the opportunity to ascertain any liaitations or options the City may have. There were no comaents from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was continued. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to table this matter until the February 20, 1990 meeting. It was the general concensus of the Planning Commission that provided the structure was hooked up to sewer, and there is a guarantee of the improvements being made should the Art Center cease to exist they would recommend approval. Schneider said that after speaking to an excavator, he was informed that a sewer hookup would not be possible until later. Hanson suggested June 15, 1990. Mabusth asked that a representative of the Art Center be present at the next meeting. Motion, Ayes“5, Nays~0, Motion passed. #1485 K-F PROPERTIES, IRC. 340/350 HORTH ARM LAME SKETCH FLAM REVIEM ^ ^ ,Mabusth explained that this is a proposed lot line rearrangement of Lots 1 and 2 of the North Arms Estate, 2nd Addition. Mabusth said that lot width variances were approved with the subdivision of this property and the developers are now asking the Planning Commission to approve an additional lot width variance of 70'. Mabusth said that the purpose of this subdivision is to provide additional septic area for Lot 1. Mabusth said that if the City asks for 17' of right-of-way from this property that the right-of-way would encroach into the drainfield area. Brown and Hanson indicated that there seemed to be sufficient hardship to warrant approval of the lot width variance. Kelley said that he had some reservation. Mr. Don Peterson, one of the developers, clarified that he had no agreement with Mr. Olson, owner of 4590 North Arm Drive, at this time. He said that Mr. Olson is not interested in subdividing and therefore is unwilling to grant 17' of his property for the City right-of-way. Mr. Peterson said that the two lots involved with this lot line rearrangement are very desireable, 4 to 5 acre lots which were created by a subdivision. Mr. Peterson said that he owns Lot 2 and has a purchase agreement for Lot 1 contingent on approval of the lot line Mr. Peterson said if the City takes the additional 17' of right-