My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1920 <br />April 15, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />DcKriptHHi of Request <br />The subject property is located directly across tb street from tlK Applebaum rcsi<knce <br />(Application #1915). The original house was desttcyed by fire in 1989. The applicant wishes <br />to construct a new residence within »he approximate footprint of the former residence, review <br />Exhibi*.-! G and H. Side and street setback variances would have to be granted for the new <br />constriction. Review Exhibit A, applicant notes lot is narrow with sloping topographies to the <br />nonli or rear. Upon your inspection note the yellow garage structure to the west. Otto wishes <br />to align the house with the yellov' garage. Major portions ot the front yard arc located within <br />the right-of-way of Highwood Road. If stand across the street, the retaming wall that <br />defined a partial drive ard serves as a backout area for the Applebaum residence, is Kxated at <br />applicant ’s southwest comer. Members may walk down the old drive that served the fomier <br />residence on die east side of the lot. Walk back to where the topography starts to slope towards <br />the County Road. <br />It is possible that the house in its proposed location would be able to achieve views of the lake. <br />The two triangular additions to property were acquired by former property owner so that existing <br />drive and former house were included Vviihin the boundaries of the property as both encroached <br />into adjacent property. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Planning Commission Members are asked to consider area and width variances for new <br />construction. Will you also grant setback variances? Can 30’ wide house be located on <br />the lot without the need for setback variances? <br />Has applicant selected the design of house that fits the topography of the property? What <br />is the hardship? <br />3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. <br />A ny recommendation of approval must include the requirement that Lots 39 and 43 be legally <br />combined. Review Exhibit B, note that each lot has a sepa’-ate PID.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.