My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 25, 1994 <br />(#9) RECONSTRUCTION OF BROWN ROAD NORTH (CONTINUED) <br />Dennis Kirby. 1020 Brown Road, sated that he believed Brown Risd homeowners would <br />support a roaw! that was 28 feet wide. <br />Denny Platietcr, 809 Brown Road North, commented that elimination of four feet for parking <br />was incorrect, since vehicles were more than four feet wide. Gusatson responded that ^ <br />minimum width they can make the road would be 28’ since that is the current sate sandard. <br />and if they don’t construct it to that width, they will not receive any MSA funding for the <br />project. Gerhardson sated that the roadway is presently 22 feet wide. <br />George Johnson, 879 Brown Road, sated they had all signed a petition requesting a 28 foot <br />wide roadway. He noted that he did not see cars parked along Brown Road now unleM it <br />was a special occasion. He felt that the parking lane could be eliminated. He sated the road <br />needs something done, but it does not need more traffic. He sated that at the rate ibe arw <br />was developing, the traffic would increase, and speed was a problem now. He inquired it <br />sewer would be insalled when the roadway was upgraded. He also commented that he <br />would like to see the bike path insalled. as it was in Sugarw(on <br />Jo Corneal, 2101 Sugarwood. sated that presently the road was very dangerous, particul^ y <br />during the winter months when everyone would drive down the center of the road^ She tcit <br />something needed to be done to make the road wider. She supported the bike path and <br />Jogging trail, and believed the neighbors supported it also. She sated that the interswtion of <br />North Brown Road with Highway 12 was hazardous and traffic is dange oiw thw. Mayor <br />Callahan commented it is not yet known how that intersection will be configured. <br />Tom l-ine, 915 Brown Road, sated that the widening of the road will bring the trail and <br />walkway within 25 feet of his front door. He requested that some of the construction be <br />done on the cast side of the roadway to reduce the impacts on his property as much as <br />possible. He sated he felt that a parking lane was not needed. Gusafson stated that the <br />roadway was going to be centered within the City’s right-of-way but they will be looking at <br />how it impacts adjacent properties. <br />Mr Schultz 744 Brown Road, sated he supported the upgrading of the roadway but was <br />opposed to the parking lane. He felt the trail should be located up against the road bed and <br />eliminate the grass median separation between the road and wil to reduce die <br />for construction. Mayor Callahan responded that the safety factor was higher if the trail was <br />separated from the roadway by a median. Schultz was concerned about the drainage and <br />whether the new roadway would increase the problems in the area. Gerhardson rwponded <br />tJat they are reviewing the drainage plans and will meet with the homeowners to discuss the <br />plans. <br />Joe Lucas, 1060 North Brown Road, sated he supported upgrading the roadway but was <br />opposed to the parking lane. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.