My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
05-09-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 3:37:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:32:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To:Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:April 14, 1994 <br />Subject:#1916 Irwin and Alex Jacobs, 1700 ShoreliiK Drive - Conditional Use Pennit <br />Public Hearing <br />Pertinent Ordinance <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) (2) <br />Total allowed area for accessory structures in excess of 9 acres <br />Existing = 10,633 s.f. <br />Proposed = 10,793 s.f. <br />6,000 s.f. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F - <br />G - <br />H - <br />Application <br />Addeixium per Jensen Homes <br />Jacobs ’ Letter of November 30, 1993 <br />Property Owners’ List <br />Plat Map <br />Hardcover Fact Sheet <br />Elevations/Floor Plans <br />Survey <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant has installed a guard house at approximately 12’ x 16' in the southern yard of <br />his lakrshore property. Note a lakeshore lot is allowed to have structures between principal <br />structure and street. The structure meets all required setbacks. The only variance required is <br />the variance to the allowed area for accessory structures on a property that exceeds 9 acres in <br />area. <br />In the fall of 1993, the Building and Zoning staff was advised of Mr. Jacobs ’ problems <br />concerning li;c immediate need to insull a sophisticated security on his property. There was no <br />way for the City to allow a building permit to be issued for this struemre because of the need <br />for the variance. Applicants ’ contractor was advised that in the recent variance approval in <br />September of 1993, a specific allowance for the total area of accessory structures was approved <br />in that land use review. The contractor was advised that if Mr. Jacobs was willing to remove <br />160 s.f. from an existing accessory structure and if total area was maintained at 10,633 s.f., the <br />City could proceed to issue a building permit. Staff heard no further from Mr. Jacobs or his <br />contractor. The applicant proceeded with the installation of building. Applicants' contractor was
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.