Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1885 <br />November 12, 1993 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Review Exhibit N. Two alternate development plans for an expanded Highway 12 <br />corridor along Connty Road 6 wUI impact this propeity. Does this innuence your <br />decision? <br />3. <br />4.The Citv planned for a total of 300450 units of fiimre development where existing and <br />proposed uses of City, the school and now Mn/DOT w.!' limit the development of those <br />units. Does this influence your decision? <br />5.Should the City’s decision be influenced by the need to make payment for certain public <br />facilities installed and planned for the servicing of these umts? <br />Planning Commission members shtmld be prepared to make a recommendauon to the <br />Council with the necessary supportive fmdings. <br />Review of PUD Development Plan <br />Proposed average lot size — 44,010 s.f. <br />Exclusive of road and open space outlet = 28.539 s.f. <br />Smallest lot s’'^s is 17,200 s.f. <br />Largest lot size is 88,970 s.f. <br />Proposed building setbacks <br />30’ front yard setback . <br />50 ’ rear yard setback, 100 ’ along County Road 6 and Willow Dnve <br />10 ’ side yard setback, 30* adjacent to Willow Drive <br />26’ to wetland <br />Lot Configuration Issues <br />sjT.it S'=rr- <br />that the 26’ setback be maintained for all land alterations and structural set ac <br />Gradingp Drainage, Wetland Areas and Flood Plain <br />Note all building pads are lined along the road with filling proposed lo ra« building sites <br />to allow for walkouts to rear. Lots 10, 11, 12, and 13 also propose » <br />information shows building pads raised 8’ to bring fill dangerously c ose <br />It is doubtful whether four lots can be developed in the area.