Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />r.‘ ■PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />NOVEMBER 15, 1993 <br />project would be viable if they were required to construct it with a one unit per two acre <br />density. <br />density issue was something he had to agree with his fellow commissioners on. The oveiall <br />density of the project was discussed. <br />Mr. Forbord commented that if the City was going to requite a density <br />this property would not be developed by Lundgren Brothers and would probably not be <br />developed at all given the expense of providing municipal uti^ties. He asked ^ity was <br />saying that they did not want this property to develop at all. Chairman Schroeder responded <br />that they wanted to see the land developed with fewer lots, but it was not accurate to say <br />that the City did not want the land to be developed at all. John Uban asked <br />Commission wouid support a plan with multiple access from County 6, and al he <br />Commissioners responded negatively. Mr. Forbord stated that it <br />land which made it so expensive to develop the project but the ®'7°'^®,^. "‘‘'’.I'’® <br />grading costs, which were three times the usual given the poor soils and the <br />table. He stated they believe the site is ideal for a PUD zoning designation, Chairma <br />Schroeder stated that they would consider the plan with a reduced density. <br />Commissioner Peterson returned to the table <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />14. Report by Planning Commission Representative to Council Meeting of November 8, 1993. <br />^^"lots <br />to draft an ordinance. He stated that the McKinney duplex was approved, although the City <br />Attorney had informed them that they could not legally require owner occupancy. <br />IS. Other issues for discussion. <br />There were none.