Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3045________ <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />, ^ , . - nroDoaed to front on and acceas to a privata <br />ariv.«y to b. con.?ructed within . 50- outlet Intend.d for <br />future development of a private road. <br />The existing residence within Lot 3 is proposed to n.lntaln its <br />driveway access directly to Watertown Roa . <br />Because this is technically « •» access via a private <br />appropria^o because• <br />and destroy certain trees and amenities of the existing <br />residence site. <br />b. The existing driveway l<>VVd°:b VVoMtion*'th ”Vs‘no? <br />hazardous based on vertical or horizontal sight lines. <br />c. Because the property exists in two ueparate <br />applicant could have - which <br />of lot line rearrangment and platting wnic in <br />resulted merely in the creation of two building <br />n“rly the Identical layout as the current <br />the requirement for fit ap'twocodes allow a shared driveway access rot tf <br />residences. <br />d. outlet A, while proposed to be .*i\e\'’^*s‘io?at2dmerely a driveway serving two new building sites, is loc <br />so as to be available for future extension to serve tne <br />future development of Lot 3. <br />It is intended that Out lot A and the 3. An <br />it shall remain in the ownership of . favor of Lots 1 <br />access easement will be required over covenants to <br />and 2. The developer will be ®*®®y^®enan^^ of the <br />define responsibility for obligation <br />driveway and Outlot A, and to define future financial o public <br />at such time that the driveway is upgraded to private o p <br />road status. <br />Page 2 of 6