My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
03-28-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:54:09 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:52:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON <br />FEBRUARY 22, 1994 <br />(#4) #1901 1903 TANDEM PROPERTIES <br />2645/3025 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDI\TSION - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Mabusih reviewed the staff report and noted the outstanding issues. She reviewed the <br />topography and illustrated the drainage flow patterns and ponding areas and culvert locations. <br />Smith inquired if the horse/jogging trail was included in the "trail" and not just the limestone <br />surface which was located higher up. She described the conditions on the horse/jogging trail <br />and the difficulties she has encountered in the past when using this trail. <br />Mark Gronberg. Gronberg & Gronberg Associates, stated they have endeavored to reduce the <br />drainage to allow this area to drain more quickly and thus be drier than it has been in the past. <br />He commented that the drainage ponds located on the Dickey property could be enlarged to <br />accommodate more water if needed. <br />Chairman Schroeder inquired if the revised plans would make the drainage situation better than <br />it is now, and Mr. Gronberg responded affirmatively. He affirmed that they have been dealing <br />with both trails, not just the higher one. <br />Gustafson stated he was not «v.are of the problems with the horse trail in this area He felt the <br />developers had provided a great deal of storm water retention, but it may not be adequate to <br />alleviate the problems on the lower trail. Peterson commented he felt the DNR had not <br />maintained the lower trail the way it should be. <br />Mabusth discussed the wetland mitigation is.sue, which is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha <br />Creek Watershed District. She referenced a letter from Director Ellen Sones regarding this, <br />which stated she was satisfied with the plan and per the Wetland Act, they will be able to <br />replace these wetlands with something better. <br />Gronberg reviewed the proposed drainage plans and illustrated the locations of the holding ponds <br />and flowage patterns upon release. He stated the holding ponds will slow the drainage rate <br />significantly, and decrease the flow by approximately one-third. He stated that because the <br />water will be released at a slower rate it will allow the water downstream to dissipate before <br />additional water comes down. <br />Rowlette inquired if there could be problems regarding the dry buildable area of the lots if the <br />holding ponds become larger due to heavy rainfall and Mr. Gronberg responded they have <br />allowed adequate area to prevent any problems like this from arising. Gustafson commented that <br />(I vas a balancing act, because it was impossible to control the amount of precipitation, but he <br />icit this was a workable plan. Discussion ensued regarding drainage problems downstream, and <br />the Planning Commission expressed concern that this development would not exacerbate already <br />existing drainage problems.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.