My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:27:51 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:23:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/J <br />//4*0#0 <br />o i'.o \ <br />f-1 <br />W CITYof OROXO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2948__________ <br />A RBSOLOTIOM GRAMTIMG <br />PRELIMIHART APPROVAL OP THB PROPOSED <br />CRYSTAL CREEK PLAT <br />PILE NO. 1457 <br />WHBRBASr Alan G. Carlson (hereinafter "the subdivider") on March <br />22, 1991 filed a revised formal subdivision application with the City for <br />approval of a 12-lot residential plat of property legally described as <br />follows: <br />Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property") and; <br />MBBRBAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with <br />Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and <br />Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on March <br />18, 1991 and March 20, 1991 and the Council on April 8, 1991 at which times <br />all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the <br />opportunity to spealc thereon; and <br />WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 8, 1991, the <br />Orono City Council considered the amended subdivision application of 12 <br />lots, noting the following findings of fact: <br />1, The property is located within the RR-IB Single Family Rural <br />Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of <br />contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. <br />2. The subdivision as amended from the original 16-lot proposal finds <br />that each lot meets or exceeds the 2-acre minimum dry contiguous lot <br />area standards. <br />3. Each of the 1? lots meets the required lot width to the rear of <br />the 50' front street setback line. <br />Page 1 of 8 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.