My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
03-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:27:51 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:23:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />(#10) #1877 TANDEM PROPERTIES/PETER ANDREA COMPANY - CONT. <br />Deanovic pointed out that no matter how the lot sizes are calculated, they arc over 2 acres. <br />Problems in the French Creek development may have been caused by not having full disclosure. <br />Gaffron explained there were designatea septic sites in that planned development of 1-1.25 acre <br />sites. However, when the sites were developed, there were different views of where the house <br />should be placed, etc. so it was difficult to protect the septic sites. <br />Peterson opined that it may be the best alternative to replace wetlands in Medina if the ultimate <br />goal is to protect wetlands even though it would be a loss to Orono. Schroeder felt the wetlands <br />should be saved in Orono. Two people from BWSR, the governmental agency that enforces the <br />technical wetland policies, did not favor mitigation in another area. <br />Putnam stated at this time the ordinances don’t mesh between the State and municipalities, which <br />causes many problems. <br />Schroeder asked how important it was that the lots be two acres. He thought some five acre lots <br />might solve some of the problems. Putnam thought it may be more difficult on the Dickey <br />property because there is already a pattern established. Wetlands, ponds and trees actually <br />increase the value of the property. Their view is that the Coffin property is more valuable and <br />the homes will be higher priced. Not all people want to have large lots they have to mow. <br />Hare commented that economics are involved but also aesthetics. The developer is proposing <br />development that may be better for the City. High ground makes a parcel more valuable. A <br />five acre site with only one acre of dry buildable may not be any more valuable than a two acre <br />lot that is ail dry buildable. People who are looking for lots in the Orono area are looking for <br />space between ^eir neighbors yet want to be part of a community. <br />Schroeder asked what the expectations are of the price of the lots and homes. Deanovic thought <br />the Dickey property would be $80,000 - $110,000 per lot and the Coffin property would be <br />higher, more comparable to Tuckborough in Medina. <br />Hare thought that enhancing the wetlands may make the property more valuable. Putnam slated <br />they would probably relocate some of them. This is an opportunity to alter Type 1 wetlands but <br />you wouldn’t want to alter Type 3 wetlands, nor would that be allowed. <br />Nolan asked what other developments the developers have done. Some of the projects they did <br />were Copperfield in Mendota Heights, several projects in Eden Prairie including Summer Oaks, <br />and many sites for Centex Homes in Eden Prairie, Plymouth, and Mendota Heights. They have <br />not done any projects with septic systems.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.