My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
02-28-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:07:10 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 1:05:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File # 1903 <br />Fcbruar>' 17. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Since the sketch plan review staff has learned that pan of the subject propen>' is torrens <br />property sand the lot line rearrangement must be recorded as a formal plat. Note survevor’s <br />notations advising of vague descriptions for boundaries of undeveloped lot along Wildhurst Trail <br />and Tonkaview Lane. Surveyor has advised that tlw plat will not be accepted by Registrar ot <br />Title Office with these boundary discrepancies. Applicant must file for a registration of <br />undeveloped lot for plat to be accepted by the County. <br />The applicant chose not to file a variance application with the subdivision application. <br />Before Mr. Lemmerman proceeds with any fiirther expenditure of funds tor registration ot <br />property, filing of variance application and platting costs, the proposed subdivision will be <br />presented for CoutKil’s conceptual approval. <br />The Planning Commission may act on the current preliminary subdivision application but <br />the final plat cannot be presented for Council’s formal and final action until the registration ot <br />the property is completed. If Council conceptually approves the proposed realignment of lot <br />lines, applicant may proceed with the necessary steps to complete the subdivision, tile a lot area <br />variance for the undeveloped lot and commence registration of remaining property. If Council <br />denies proposed lot line rearrangement, applicant may file a lot area variance for the existing <br />lot at .78 acres. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />Should shared lot line be readjusted at northwest comer of proposed Lot 2 so that <br />existing garage meets 10 ’ side yard setback.^ <br />Upon review of 'he topographic information, does the newly proposed division line <br />reflect limitatioa^ of physical boundaries.’ <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval must include the following <br />conditions: <br />1 . Application cannot be presented for Council’s action until registration of abstract <br />lands is finalized. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Designation of drainage and utility easements 10 ’ wide along the perimeter <br />property lines of both lots and 5 ’ along the interior. <br />Realignment of side lot line so that existing garage can meet 10 ’ side setback -- <br />any other changes to reflect topographic natural boundaries of properties?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.