02-14-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

‘ Request for Council Action coittinued to. 1994 Zoning FUe #1862 extension of a through road linking property to west via Goldcnview Drive. The majority of the Planning Commission found there was no need for a future road extension to the west connecting property with Goldenview Drive. Retention ponds are required to allow adequate storage of runoff. Extensive grading of ditches and berms are required to achieve storm water control. The preliminary plat was approved by the Planning Commission as proposed in a 5 to 2 vote. The minority opinion voted nay based on the issue of a future connection road link to GoldenView Drive. The following ordinances and Comp Plan sections are pertinent to this review; Chapter 11, specifically the sections dealing with Class III subdivisions Section 11.10. Subd. 21 (C) - Private Roads Section 11.32. Subd. 2 - "Roads" Section 11.32. Subd. 2 (B-6) - Issue of Cul-de-sac Roads Section 11.33, Subd. 4 - Road Specs/Standards Section 11.40, Subd. 3 - Road Deduction and Reservations Section 11.62, Parks and Playgrounds of Class II and III Subdivisions, Exhibit N Section 10.28, RR-IB Zoning District Standards Total area = 194- acres (.89 acres wet) Lots 1 -7 consist of 2 acres dry contiguous Lot 8 consists of 3.5 acres dry Comp Plan Sections dealing with rural private roads. Exhibit M Lot Standards/Configuration The subdivision plan proposes 7 new lots and Lot 8 retains all existing homestead improvements. The surveyor has provided a plan offering two options of development. Review Exhibit V. one alternative provides an extension road to the west. Note hatched line corridor at north lot line of proposed Lot 7 and realigned lot line shown through Lot 8. Based on the location of the septic test sites and adjacent potxl area. Planning Commission members doubted whether there was adequate room for a house site within Ijoil with the development plan providing road connection. All lots meet the required 200’ lot width measured at the 50 ’ setback line. This includes Lots 4, 5 and 6 adjacent to cul-de-sac. Grading/Drainage There were no designated wetlands witbm the property based on the City’s designated wetland maps, review Exhibit H. A natural ponding area has been created in Lot 8 as a significant drainage way runs from the southwest to the northeast through this property, review Exhibit I. The majority of surface runoff from property drains into the Daniels Long Lake Heights Subdivision along the east creating problems during wet seasons. There is a severe drainage