Laserfiche WebLink
I ‘ - <br />•.• <br />T ^ • <br />hs-1 <br />i *r <br />4 « <br />%■ <br />ngi*...•;>•■...•'..,•-V >* r ■»'•*••■• <br />j=>*r vv The Minnetonka Yacht Club (MYC)’* has‘submi t ted a new mult iple <br />dock license application for reconf igurat ion of its docks at <br />Site I,'Carsons Bay, Deephaven, per' site p 1 an ' submitted ■' <br />^/•^^l/3/9A.‘ ■n--.■■V <br />f a.’'^ Twenty DMA buoys would be converted to twenty dock-s l ip <br />a*" spaces, 10’ x 24*. This is ul lowed under Code Sect ion^ i . <br />*•<*'•% <br />' • <br />' H / »f <br />b. <br />c. <br />2.04, Subd. 9. ' " . <br />Fifteen existing 14’ x 35’ slips would be reconfigured, <br />with six reduced in size. <br />Ten slide storage spaces charged at one WSU each V-., '/ ;y; , <br />(10’ X 20’) would be converted to dock slips 9* x 24’r* /‘**T ' <br />(1.5 WSU, each) • * /Cl'A-.v, <br />•*t <br />w ■ <br />’•f <br />The proposed site plan has two discrepancies from the Code: <br />a.' The northeast corner is beyond the 100* length limit. <br />b.The required 35* side setback is not met on the west. <br />Tom and Pat McGoldrick, 19575 Chimo West, neighbors to the <br />east, expressed concern about the following: <br />a.- Heavy traffic in area due to Deephaven public launch <br />« <br />-r- <br />vt <br />e.' Additional congestion due to narrowed boat traffic <br />^ >'* corridor ■ * • <br />. . .•f ,, The winter traffic from the pub 1 ic ramp passing close'^» <br />Jk <br />4 • <br />Af <br />•Sr' ft •1 fimV« *im \ <br />T t-’/*• •:*■ <br />%. <br />*■ <br />to the proposed new dockage on the east. .. ^ a, <br />' . .. v'. ■ . •'Vr<if.ai. <br />4./-' Bob Loeffel, 19605 Chimo West, neighbor to the east ,\said <br />’ that the property is zoned-resident ial wi th a non-conforming. <br />use. Any change would need the City of Deephaven’s approv- <br />al. 's-- <br />5.MYC has a special density license allowing 1:10’ boab'stor- * <br />age density. The total shoreline for all three sites is <br />1,898’ with 182 boat storage units (BSU). However, the <br />density at this site is greater than 1:10’ with 36 BSU on <br />290’ of shoreline (1:8’). The 20 DMA buoys would add. to this <br />’ ^d e n s X t y •..^..Viii, • - <br />. >; <br />- <br />^.V‘ <br />•I •,'*K'. <br />Y> <br />fii'•i <br />i-' <br />I' <br />6. “5j The Code does not require a- new special tlensity license-, <br />this case because no additional BSU are being added,^ but <br />new dock license is required because of the reconfiguration. <br />' rv The’ DMA exchange is al lowed under • Sect iom 2.04y’ Subd <br />'.'without d new special densi ty 1 icense. >. . . <br />4 -•.4 mm 1 • <br />•■.i ;‘i ■ <br />a <br />V •.