My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
02-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 12:59:23 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 12:52:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD ON JANUARY 18, 1994 <br />with the easements in place to connect it at a future time. Mr, Gronbcrg stated that they <br />would like to accommodate the neighborhood, and keep the cul-de-sacs as proposed, but they <br />would like to have the streets designated as public streets. Eugene Hite commented the <br />residents are concerned about the construction traffic using Countryside Lane. <br />Mabusih explained that many streets that are cul-de-saced are private streets, and the City <br />does not maintain them until they are connected through roads and at that point they are <br />dedicated as public streets. She noted that the number of lots was sufficient to warrant <br />conne. i'Mi at this time. Chairman Schroeder commented that it appeared that the Planning <br />Commissi n did not believe there was a need to connect the roadway at this time, as long as <br />easemenu are retained to permit connection in the future when the City felt it was necessary <br />to do so. Mabusth reminded the Commission that if it was going to become necessary to <br />connect the streets in the future, they should do it now while the development was being <br />done to avoid the expense of having to do it later. Discussion ensued regarding the cost <br />factors involved in roadway construction and the maintenance costs if the streets remain <br />private. Chairman Schroeder commented that if the City has determined that the subdivision <br />will be built, he did not see the public interest was diverted by keeping it two cul-de-sacs <br />with the option to connect them in the future. <br />Commissioner Rowlette commented she did not believe the Planning Commission could make <br />a recommendation to the City Council until the drainage information was submitted. <br />Chairman Schroeder noted that the consensus of the Planning Commission was that the <br />proposal was a good one, and he would support it pending resolution of some issues, such as <br />drainage, etc. <br />Commissioner Rowlette moved, Lindquist seconded, to table ^1901 Tandem Properties, <br />2645/3025 Watertown Road. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />(m #1893 CHRISTINE A. FREEMAN, 2240 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Steve Jensen, architect, stated he was present representing the applicant. Mabusth reviewed <br />the proposal and stated that if the Planning Commission recommended approval it must <br />include the disclaimer that if plastic or geo-technic fabric is found beneath landscaped areas, <br />that the existence of such would be in violation of the conditions of approval, and will <br />require immediate removal. <br />Mr. Jensen stated that there is no hardcover variance but there was a setback variance. He <br />noted that there is no plastic or geo-technic fabric in the vicinity of the garage. <br />Commissioner Rowlette inquired if there was adequate area to accommodate emergency <br />vehicles and Mabusth responded affirmatively.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.