Laserfiche WebLink
¥VI ij-piGU r * <br />Players in the-planning process <br />Understanding the planning process .•.unaersianuirig.Elements o(,a comprehensive plan <br />r>. '.t-r ••- BASIC PLANNING TOOLS — PART I: - <br />' 2Sn1ng.^arian ^ conditional use PERMJS <br />■•: Definitions. Rationale. Uses. Myths/Misconceptions. How - <br />•,,to ’s. Non-conforming Uses: . -. . <br />T.ZONING CASE STUDIES:* •' ^' <br />-• HYPOTHETICAL PROBLEM SOLVING :.' <br />••Participants'are; placed'into small groups m which they. <br />' worlcorrruralor uitan zoning issues. • <br />^ --- <br />YOUR LEGALUMITS; <br />. YOUR ROLE AS A DECISION MAKER - <br />•< •. The changing environment in land use I . - *- <br />Legal limits":- - - ' ’ ;V <br />*r Procedures-tdkeep from being sued ‘' <br />•When something goes.wrong. who ’s liable? .-;•.. <br />v.'r-ConfJiCfof interest*.:, <br />•V..VwVHow-your attorney can help*' • * • -• •*; <br />/Wideo ptesentatiom/Rudehaven* •’‘ <br />. HOT isSUESr-^PART I:r L•.'ANSWERS Ta.YOUR.QUESTIONS (Faculty Panel) .. <br />iBASiC PLANNING TOOLS — PART Hr <br />-* SUBDIVISION REGULATION •. <br />VDefinitiOfi. Rationale. Uses.- Content. Procedures. Design <br />; ;-Standards; Rhandal Guaranties. Special Provisions. - . ^ <br />•EVALUAtlON OF A SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL; <br />.OASIMULA-nOW; r ‘V * • , ' <br />-^Participants'work in small groups-to evaluate a develop- <br />.-'-i er*s subdivision-plan using standard planning tools — the <br />5 comprehensive plan.'ordinances; and maps. ;. . , - <br />HOTISSUES —PART II: " : V •^ ^ <br />■' “ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS (Faculty Panel) • <br />, .V <br />>i-' fruiu UtUlJCi fcrycu iiwt <br />dated findings of fact ........V • <br />r* *-PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT ,. <br />.. (Of Any Size). . . /. - -“..^V*- *' <br />.- -• . Some definitions and background - .;v".. ,.<r <br />■How tools relate to each other : --V ,-.y <br />•Subdivision exactions and dedications.'*:. -.V.--. ‘ -y - <br />-Role of comprehensive plan: standards. ^. •' , : *j:V - <br />. 5 Public and private secto*- perspectives.: <br />=- Implementation strategies ' ; ’ v <br />-Legal issues * • ‘ . '•* -. 7'• <br />Pitfalls/words to the wise. . ‘; ‘ <br />Adoption requirements - -. -. ' <br />*» r' •.^ <br />V. • ;• ' : <br />• * .**- • ••BASIC LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS. <br />Open Meeting Law : ^ <br />Conf'ict of interest . <br />Making findings of fact that supportyourJandruse;...^^y.> <br />decisions \ <br />^SE LAW UpbATEr. 'v f.i.r.'VfRECENT CASE LAW UPDATE; <br />-'/HATS HOT, WHAT’S NOT“ <br />•Summary of recent land use cases.. <br />•Proposed new zoning/enabling legislation'->*-.' ■. • <br />-»* <br />»v T <br />coping ^with*ti^'realitiesofthe :.pla ^^^: <br />PROCESS • . <br />' • How to (and how not to) conduct public.heanngs •,*., . <br />••• I pnal Guidelines ' ' ‘Legal guidelines - <br />Practical tips from a local elected official * /.• <br />», r. <br />alternative URBAN AREA-WIDE REVIEW <br />1: . * <br />QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SPECIRC ;.,• <br />SITUATIONS (Faculty Panel) ' - - -- <br />-v;:*FACULTY'- ‘^ ■ <br />-.-i ;■ ' ••MAN;TRAQUAIR'BALL;.pianner and Attorney.' . <br />..;^■-^tRasmussen•&'Ball••■-’•'-y■:; <br />WILLIAM GRIFFITH;Attorney. Larkin. Hoffman^i ., . . <br />'yy '•'Daly i.lJndgrehrv^i^:-',• -, -. •‘■y,’*:;^.-’ty, <br />•t • <br />FACULTY <br />•r' j <br />Vi'S • Lzaiy OL.WM » - . - - <br />•' .‘Robert LOCKYEAR, Director of Plarining and <br />• M Mm • ___ ta # <br />' V-'- .••' . -.•:• V <br />.’. PETER BACHMAN, Attorney; Leonard; iSlreetand^..-*. <br />. . Deinard / .. <br />'y JOHN SHARDLOW, President: Dahlgrem* y'-.V2^ <br />-.-c.-r.:' <br />v" <br />*;> <br />V. <br />•>•' s:. <br />* <br />-•.: -V** <br />*.r. ' : - <br />.***• r • <br />•••.. •. <br />•,*r • .• •• <br />•*.*.. . <br />*.? *.*. <br />V—L. ^' r.,.... • , <br />4.^