My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
02-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 12:59:23 PM
Creation date
12/8/2023 12:52:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Klotsche <br />2760 Shadywood Road <br />Orono/ Mn <br />jx crs iT» ft# 1 d O . ^ <br />hardcover variance proposal <br />1)The original building is constructed with few options for deletion of <br />existing hardcover primarily because of driveway easement over which we <br />have no control <br />2)Making adjustments to the back yard portion of the property is ineffective <br />due to the layout of the house and garage on the prcperty, the easement on <br />the east/ the natural, treed hill on the west and the street on the south <br />3)All areas supported by retaining walls cannot be altered or it would underinine <br />the driveway areas <br />4)The substantial front and side yards are well beyond the reguired side set” <br />backs and the 75* zone A setback and with the exception of the addition to <br />the north, will not be altered in any way <br />5)The proposed addition is a logical, natural and unobtrusive use of dead space <br />6)We are willing to give up all areas underlain with plastic,444.8Sg.ft, at <br />a considerable maintenance increase <br />7)we cure willing to give up a 2' cement walkway at 90 sq. ft <br />8)With the deletion of the plastic underlayment areas and the cement walkway <br />area, the hardcover will increase by a mere 1%, including the proposed <br />addition <br />AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE <br />1)Angle of the addition was chosen to minimize obstruction to the north <br />2)The large pine tree already obstructs the northern neighbor's view and <br />the proposed addition falls behind it <br />3)Neighbor to the south is not impacted <br />4)Consideration has been given to keeping the integrity of the house <br />and yard intact with as little disturbance to tlie current setting as <br />possible
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.