Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />/6 <br />Majror and City CoiaicU <br />Roq Moo ^^, Cay Admmmratoc <br />January 19. 1994 <br />%> <br />Desisnalioa of die Responaabk Local Govermaeot Unit (LGU) for Implemciaation <br />of die Wetland Cooservatioo Act <br />Attacianent: Mchkj From Mike Giffroo Res^tfdiDg die Desifoaiioo of die Respoittibte Local <br />Goveiaaent Umt (LGU) for In^ikitieidaiioe of die W'etland C<Koervatioo Act <br />The snoinanzes the backfround of the W^ctland Conscnration Act and the cit>'s <br />two options regardinf the desigmtKm of an LGU for the tmpienientation of the act. The city <br />must either adopt the pcrmaoeiH Wetland Conservitioo Act rules and assume r^ipoosibility as <br />the LGU or designate the Minnehaha Creek Watershed as LGU. The memo also outlines the <br />factors die Council should consider in choostng between the two optiocs. <br />Suff initially planned to dis:russ this item in a work scssioo. However, because of the short <br />CcMincil ageiida. suff will be prepared to discuss this isuie in depth if the Council so desires. <br />Options for Council Action <br />A. Table for further infomution/discussion <br />B. Make a deurmination regarding tlK LGU designatioii