Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />MEVLTES OF THE PARK CO>DUSSION NtEETC^iG OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 <br />UPDATE ON BEKE/HIKE TRAIL - CONT. <br />Chair Fliat did oot think Option ^ would be less expensive because it would require more <br />expense to the City and wouW not connect to Baker Park. <br />Chair Flint recommended approval of the conceptual proposal from Hennepin Parks m their <br />letter of October 29. 1993 and that it be brouglM to City CouncU. The motion was secondc y <br />White. This proposal is similar to Option #3 in Ron Moorsc s letter. <br />While expressed his opinion that there was not enough support for the Old Crv stal Bay Road <br />trail even though he favored this route. They may have to look at airotlar option. <br />M''Millan reviewed the proposal from Hennepin Parks stating that Hennepin Parks would build <br />the trail from Baker Park to Old Crystal Bay Road aiKl pay 100% of that cost. ^ <br />City splits the cost with them for the route down Old Crystal Bay Road or Hen^pm Par^ <br />builds a traU further west at their cost. She felt a r-commendaiion to Council would have to be <br />more specific. W'hite fell this was a step towards getting a trail. <br />Wilson disagreed. She fell this was political and buying tunc for Hennepin County so they could <br />get what thev want. She would be more supportive if she knew the property owners were m <br />fgreement. Drainage concerns also exist. She favors staying with the Old Crystal Bay Road <br />trail as previously proposed. <br />Use asked if the proposal could be approved with the possibility of alternative routes such as the <br />McCulley corridor. She views the proposal differently than Wilson. She feels Brysmt is <br />working towards a proposal that is flexible enough to work with to gain approval with the <br />Council. The Park Commission has already been working on this tor 2 1/2 years which shows <br />their commitment to a trail. <br />McMillan expressed her concern over having a five year legal agreement because the Council <br />could change as well as other things. <br />Chair Flint suggested an amendment to his motion if Wilson were in agreement to a change <br />stating the traU would not have to be m the Orchard Park corridor but could be in another <br />corridor Wilson objected stating there was not enough information on optional corridors. <br />McMillan also expressed concern over publicity without having property owners fully informed. <br />Chair Flint felt the five year time frame was an advantage because it gave tne City lime to smdy <br />development. Wilson felt Hennepin County was xr/ing to "tie" the City into an agreement but <br />Chair Flint explained that after the meeting with Hennepin County, the letter could have been <br />written by either Doug Bryant or Ron iMoorse because there was agreement about the proposed <br />plans.