Laserfiche WebLink
'♦.■v-v iS - i; .V. •i '■ T?/V-- ••4»I J"mm,imm wa <br />tached <br />jtruct an <br />served by <br />ke useful <br />ittach the <br />number of <br />irtf hence <br />equire <br />tryway <br />len the <br />iflict <br />■' ...HP <br />M\ <br />mmm <br />^ :i <br />^ *■ -Ml <br />A,., <br />rAAi*i;'' ‘.a <br />k." <br />' P?«S <br />I:'*": <br />iLiteteai <br />^L-rr <br />« <br />£' ■■'■'ife • 'S ;. •-te <br />■■ <br />V-i’> <br />■• 4Vv’' ■••' <br />^'./A <br />"P <br />■ .■ <br />w-y-'S <br />• '. : :.:Ai <br />C : ’■ ■ - ' -■ ■ <br />1 "ft •■ -fty v'. :: <br />»ft ■ <br />■ft , ft'-ft. ft :'-iL : <br />’ft : ■■■ .'r ■■ft;'ftft-. ^■ „ <br />f -■ <br />ft :; .-ft. <br />«='■ ■■?'-. <br />I : \ <br />.•;.. :-fj' <br />Vl:^i > <br />. ' V .. <br />% <br />-:i <br />H-' <br />■‘.'v ■“Zoning File #1274 Page 24. No attachment to the left side of the house is feasible due to the location of the existing septic system; additionally, this would <br />require a major revision of the driveway location which would start to <br />encroach into the area needed for replacement of the septic system. <br />The existing septic system on this property was found to be failing in <br />1983. A permit was issued for the replacement of that system in 1984, but <br />the work has never been completed. The system has been functioning <br />marginally since that time, however, since that system still has a high <br />potential for failure it should be replaced. <br />An argument could be made that because the lot sizes in this area are <br />around 1 acre, that the neighborhood property owners' expectations are not <br />necessarily as strict regarding setbacks as if this had been developed at a <br />2 acre density. In Orono's 1 acre zones, only a 10' side setback is <br />required. Absent any opposition from the affected neighbor, it would not <br />seem inappropriate to allow the 21' setback proposed. <br />Staff Reon—ir ndation <br />Staff recommends approval of the side setback variance to allow the <br />attached garage to be constructed 21' from the side lot line, finding that <br />the proposed garage location is the most appropriate given existing <br />development on the site, and given that there will be no significant <br />encroachment of light, air, or open space enjoyed by the neighboring <br />affected property. <br />.1: <br />ft <br />-\.V;' r . „v V: <br />ft. <br />■v; -- •. •■; -ft- k.' . d, <br />it:’ ^ .) <br />ft‘ ^ <br />■ ft V ' <br />*1 <br />I <br />1. <br />ftft <br />■ft y-Sr^^ 'r'^'k <br />.ft j <br />■•/.V - <br />ft.' • . ft' ftiv