Laserfiche WebLink
V . <br />H <br />• 0' <br />i'.: <br />: * <br />t *. <br />f* . / •?«*r2 . <br />A <br />I t <br />i;i <br />:.jfar. <br />if <br />Zoning File #1280 <br />June 1S» 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />for driveway purpoaea# hence neither of the eaaepenta <br />in wlictit. Chain of title h.v. . .Igniflc.nt .ff.ct on thl. <br />wu“tlon. »ey ^ hn*. . .Ignlficnt eff«:t in th. fntnr. d.vlop-nt <br />of propertiea to the north of applicanta property. <br />rhMfc one of Mr. Pranklin'a concerna waa that applicant would <br />r..ov.‘’“,«vVl «*h«dr«f.c. fro- th. .ro. f«\“Anno\"lVoVAy“~;: aec... to hia propartiaa. Iha fact ia, applicant cannot legally ra-o« <br />Miatino outside her property boundaries# and probably should not <br />Srdw».r^«lttln prSparty that i. ».«i by “y ‘‘Vi'*”: <br />TlnTcurrent propoaal doea not indicate that any rewovala which would be <br />detrivental to any potential eaaea»nt holdera are propoaed. <br />*^^s5f *otea^aga in that the iMgnitude of the propoaed i* EouaeMost of the 3* narrowing of the deck at the lakeside of the house <br />SSTaian w by additio”.! ”t.lra.y located in th. .... •J**- <br />Staff would auggaat that a deck of no -ota than 4 <br />tK l.ke.ide of the hou.e, with the •t«i*»«yhouae and incorporated into the new deck structure at that location. <br />Since the setback between garage and house now doea not need a <br />vm^j^ancOf bha raguaatad variancaa ara aa followat <br />1. Additional atructura in 0-75* aona. <br />2. 30.0% hardcovar in 0-75* aona. <br />3. 38.9% hardcovar in 75-250* aona (25% allowadi. <br />thia application in relation to the property ownara righta. <br />v; <br />A- <br />• • f-ea <br />< <br />.4*r <br />•> <br />*• <br />y <br />h <br />(! <br />■ <br />f <br />i. <br />V