My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
06-20-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 8:36:11 AM
Creation date
12/7/2023 1:47:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
; r <br />** * <br />^ i <br />ii r'lflMii <br />’ :i- <br />n • <br />X • - <br />‘?. * <br />Bandicapped Parking Stalin <br />1 apace per 560 stalls <br />320 f 50 - 6.56 or 7 <br />Applicant nust nake spaces with approved signs. <br />Drainage - The City Engineer has reviewed the plans submitted Exhibit H, <br />The City Engineer feels the plan is acceptable with the modification that <br />drainage should be directed to the swale as shown on plan. <br />Bnilding Plans - (Exhibit I 6 J) <br />Staff has reviewed the plans and found that the material use will <br />blend into the existing building. Also submitted Exhibit F is a letter <br />from the Architect which states that the structure is under the 30* maximiun <br />height and will be consistant with the Orono Codes. <br />Signage - Existing - meets requirements of Code - No change <br />Fire Code kevlew - In the review by the City Engineer he has stated that a <br />hydrant be provided in the south west corner with an access road. Since <br />the applicant has provided a fire suppression system within the last 2 <br />years, it is staffs recommendation that the sprinkler system will provide <br />adequate titm protection. Sprinkler systems are considered an acceptable <br />alternative to hydrant and access. Fire lanes should be maintained at <br />loading docks and along the front of the structure. <br />SAC Unit Charge - This charge will require that applicant complete form <br />MtfCC 86B and get Metro Waste Commission approval before a building permit <br />is issued. <br />Lamdseaping Plan - Applicant is proposing to continue tree planting in the <br />front of the structure with fruit trees (Exhibit 6). <br />Staff Beoomswndatlon <br />Staff recommends approval of the Commercial Site Plan based on the <br />following: <br />1. The propose structure/addition and operation is not determents1 <br />to the public health, saftey and welfare, or materially Injurious to <br />properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br />2. Proposed structure and use meets Opono Municipal and Boning Code <br />requirements. <br />3. Drainage is directed to swale as recommended by City Engineer. <br />4. That applicant completes Metro Waste Commission addition form 86B <br />to determine SAC units. <br />IK <br />-4 u <br />I <br />^ * <br />*r <br />F?' <br />m <br />' 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.