Laserfiche WebLink
m.;w-v ■■■: ;.: ■: "y ■•’•• . .y•';*:« ^. 0: .-S' • • ■-V ?• T-y-.^W.V;^,:; : >• ••;/■ ■ ; V" '0dinlnistrator <br />e - Variance - <br />yard setback 11' for <br />jcture) <br />lients <br />cm <br />v:::v.::^- <br />-‘,: .V --‘ ■ . <br /><?; . ..I : . I- : , - <br />:iv-,- ,-i-. :■ i <br />■■*. ..I fm0sm <br />m <br />■ I <br />Itf-l#i <br />■-;7?l <br />•■••• • ■ r |‘: • ..'•>•. ■■ <br />y syftSffl <br />Application 11250 March 10, 1988 Page 2 of 2The applicant proposes a 22'x 21.5* garage addition to the north side of the existing residence. As applicant's addendum notes, the retaining walls adjacent to the driveway were destroyed in <br />the stom of July 23rd of this past year. Applicant has restored <br />the retaining walls in hopes of using the new walls as part of <br />the structure of the new garage. As Ms. Wells points out, the <br />existing house is 11' from the west side property line and garage <br />addition will not encroach any closer within the substandard <br />setback area. The improvements appear consistent with the <br />setbacks of other garage, and accessory structures within the <br />adjacent Orono Lane properties. Certainly the required <br />emergency separation of 10' is satisfied even with the <br />encroac’.m?nt of the adjacent house on the west side. The garage <br />as it extends from the house is 14* from the side property line <br />and as it moves northward it measures 15* from the side <br />property line. <br />The applicant is in the process of major upgrading of the yard <br />areas and the existing residence. During the review of the <br />hardcover facts please note that almost the entire yard within <br />the 250-500' setback area was gravel parking area. With the new <br />plan there is more of a controlled access onto Orono Lane and a <br />complete reduction in the driving and parking area, and will no <br />longer require hardcover variances. <br />Both adjacent neiThbors have been notified of the proposed <br />improvement and the City has received no negative comments from <br />either property owner. The placement of the garage in relation <br />to the adjacent higher elevation along the west property line <br />will shield the proposed structure and lessen the visual impact. <br />The existing vegetation also helps to lessen the impact. <br />Staff Recommendation - To approve side setback variance of 16' or <br />53% for a proposed garage addition for the property located at <br />1397 Orono Lane based on the following findings and hardships: <br />1. The property is 106' wide and contains a total of 31,540 <br />s.f. or .72 acres and is subject to the LR-IA lot standards <br />that would require 2 acres in area and 200' of width. The <br />current structure does not satisfy the 30' side setback on <br />either the eeist or the west side. <br />2. The proposed structure does not encroach any further into <br />the substandard side setback area. <br />3. The elevations and plantings along the west ®ide property <br />line lessen the visual impact of the proposed structure. <br />4. The applicant has reduced the hardcover within the 250- <br />500' setback area, thereby reducing hardcover by <br />approximately 1,025 s.f. or 30%. <br />5. The improvement appears consistent with the pattern of <br />development within the immediate neighborhood. <br />mi m <br />t •. 1 ■I::', ■. ' . ■$ <br />r;,'^k:y^;;;.yy:y <br />fey-WyyyyVfv-mumm. <br />l-KV,,- <br />: •<. I <br />.« '. y* :v; r <br />4 <br />^y^"' 'y 'y - y ■, V 4^ <br />: -:.:-LM-^y^: y4:tS <br />a'j--y^C4■^;Vy;■^:'.•^■yy> <br />:4'' ' :'y^'..yy V''-' <br />1P;.-.yy-'y:a;;V■;i <br />WMm <br />m <br />ll;:-