My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
03-21-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 10:38:58 AM
Creation date
12/6/2023 11:56:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.V :■■•■plication with the City Attorney's em with vacating portions of the Iking for a total vacation. The <br />tute does not establish standards <br />bhe City could approve the partial <br />total vacation of Forest Boulevard <br />and create less problens in the <br />J by the City. <br />(Exhibit H), clearly this current <br />r Mr. Nelson. Reviw.. Exhibit <br />Bison's property is via unimproved <br />e was vacated, the access to Lot 3 <br />ce right-of-way. Nelson was not <br />It is interesting to note that in <br />16, that sought a variance for the <br />this issue was not raised, as part <br />le difficult access via the current <br />le current application is approved <br />ve to be resolved via other means. <br />B of action involving the present <br />ition. <br />>n but include Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and <br />i by the Planning Commission until <br />c owners - we do not want to create <br />ir. Nelson in the previous vacation <br />Bvard, Vine Place and the park of <br />hen recommend that we once again <br />al in order to contact each of the <br />slve any access problems that may <br />.e that portion of Buff Street or <br />corridors to the lakeshore as fire <br />revicus vacations. <br />the proposed vacation based on the <br />on of the shoreline of Forest Lake <br />Id prohibit road construction. <br />!8 within the subject area nor are <br />rea in the future. <br />-v.Vj <br />v;• ... . <br />w- <br />mym v,-.-m'"■■V .. •••■m iitoeing File tl2)i Nereh 1«, 19M Fege 3 of 13. There are m» drsinagewayt ©r protected wetlsnds within the subject sres.4. The sress of Forest Boolevard, vine Flsce sad the park of Saga <br />Hill Revised serve no current public purpose andl no future public <br />purpose or need. <br />5. The vacation of Forest AveAje prohibits installatiori of Forest <br />•oelevard as a through road. <br />If Planning CoMsission reeoa —nds the partial vacations as proposed, <br />the applicaticwi mey be acted on and preaented for Council's forsuil action. <br />If Planning Commission wishes to expend on the present application, staff <br />would suggest that we table action until a.l affected property o«mers have <br />been contacted. If total vacation of Forest Boulevard ia proposed, then <br />indeed problems such as Hr. Nelson's mutt be resolved prior to scheduling <br />It before Council for final action. <br />I <br />*1' -i;'fo:'- zSt: -■■■,, ■ ii; 1};S <br />Vj-: <br />■J <br />" . -■ -‘'V-■•V - v/ . ^ ^ -: <br />^ ' '■ ■: ■ '.•• "4v:V.^ ■ •
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.