Laserfiche WebLink
iMmt'’V- J.- ' ■ .“t ■ ■ =■■' <br />Any person <br />meet with <br />subdivision <br />;oncecning <br />schedules, <br />division in <br />n. <br />proposing <br />the Zoning <br />, to obtain <br />subdivision <br />The Zoning <br />accordance <br />definitions. <br />definitions, <br />e definitions. <br />and Requirements <br />Plan is an initial <br />id serves as the basis <br />and the subdivider and <br />it. <br />S 11.10within sixty days If I and requirements of <br />id requirements upon <br />conditioned either <br />ropriate agreements <br />>rtify final approval <br />complied with all <br />all be deemed finally <br />ute a certificate to <br />lion may be filed or <br />iminary approval and <br />s the subdivider and <br />comprehensive plan or <br />he use, development <br />or platting required <br />reafter, pursuant to <br />od by agreement with <br />irformance conditions <br />of a new application <br />tment has occurred in <br />>n and the subdivider <br />I a consequence of a <br />;n connection with a <br />.opment, the City may <br />•ferred to herein for <br />h it determines to be <br />P-(S'-::'';*:-srianaing COMisslosi Chairetan Kelly Orono Planning Comission Nmaibers City Administrator Bernhardson <br />tlichael ?. Gaffron, Asst Planning i Idninf Administrator <br />March B, 1918 <br />Smbiecti I12U John B. Maldron, 1951 Concordia Street: - <br />Cotiditi(Mial Use Permit i Variance - Belerral Back Prom Council <br />for Beview of Revised Proposal <br />This Item originally was reviewed by the planning Commiasion on <br />Sovembar 16th, 1987. The Planning Commiaaion racommandad denial of tha <br />deep cut to create a walk-out whila recommanding approval for a ground- <br />level deck eree in exchange for removal of the exiating patio deck near the <br />lakeshore. In January 1918, the Council voted 4-0 to deny the walk-out <br />excavation, finding no valid hardahip to support its approval. The Council <br />failed to eddresa the iaaue of additional hardcover easociated with the <br />ground-level deck. <br />Applicant then Bulaaitted a revised proposal for grading, which would <br />cut approximately halt of the lakeshore yard down to s depth of 3 below <br />the existing surfa''#. This revised proposal has been referred by the <br />Council beck to the Planning Commiasion for review. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit P <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Exhibit I <br />Exhibit J <br />Exhibit K <br />- Applicant's Letter Dated 3/2/88 <br />- Applicant's Host Recent Hardcover Calculations as Revised <br />by Staff 3/10/88 <br />- Diagram Showing Average Lakeshore Setbacks <br />- Applicant's 2/29/88 Letter with Grading Plans, Elevation <br />Views, Cross Section, Plan View of Deck <br />- Applicant's Photo of Lakeshore Area <br />- Applicant's Photo of 1360 Cherry Place Cut <br />- Staff Sketch on Photo of Relative Visual Impact <br />- Staff Sketches of 9 Optional Methods <br />- Previous Meeting Minutes <br />- Consultant Letters; <br />A. City Engineer Glenn Cook <br />B. Hennepin H.W.C.D.'s Jzunes Piegat <br />C. Applicant's Engineer Letter <br />- Applicant's SBA Loan Worksheet