Laserfiche WebLink
: -1• Vy-\-AJ: M.FBBfiOART 8, 19B8 <br />Kplained the revised <br />a in relation to the <br />ided by Councllnenber <br />2363 approving the <br />/es 5, Nays 0. <br />plained that Council <br />ivatlon cut at their <br />;ant r.as subsequently <br />3' deep flat-bottomed <br />md a balcony from the <br />ntlon of the existing <br />aff recommended that <br />e Planning Commission <br />Lan does not indicate <br />the lakeshore bank. <br />matter and explained <br />lakeshore yard area, <br />to eliminate the need <br />oposes to repair the <br />the slope where the <br />It the remaining bank <br />vent future erosion, <br />re 500-600 cubic yards <br />‘oposal would involve <br />soil disturbance. He <br />ction regarding thJ s <br />ick to the Planninc, <br />more information from <br />offer any conceptual <br />h Mayor Grabek noting <br />formation on soil <br />■ L..s'm <br />">V. <br />.y.. V,/yy-,.. v ; <br />P:iS '.ct • ' : 3 <br />; .i. - <br />Sir <br />Aj'tA <br />T-.-':v, ■ <br />^ "j <br />•y|ii <br />r V-!1 <br />» <br />C... ‘^ 'tit %.*■muBraa m tm la^iuai mam comm MBmws i11223COKffXWtSB^Council indicated to Mr. Valdron that they needed more information to make a declaion based on City policy and City hdniniatrator Bernhardson delineated the 5 <br />alternatives that should be analysed for the Planning <br />Commission and Council. <br />tOMT B, ItBI <br />It was movod by Mayor Grabak, soconded by Count.Inember <br />Sima, to table thie applicetioo pending review and <br />recosnendation from the Planning CoSMaiesion. Motion* <br />Ayes 5* Maya 0. <br />•1232 BBTt BOlLOnS/CU <br />60/100 BTiaBS BAT RQA0 <br />nOLIMlHABT 80BDIVIS10II <br />IBBSOSATIQB 12364 <br />ff C. DMNtL <br />ThcMsas Beta end Clement Kroll <br />matter. <br />were present for this <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed 5- <br />lot division of 2 parcels. All five lots will be served <br />by e private road. <br />loning Administrator Mabusth noted that on-site testiri <br />lhas confirmed that four lota have adequate area for on- <br />aite aewage treatment aystema (septic testing is not <br />required for one lot because it exceeds i* acres in <br />area). Staff has recoausended an outlet extension be <br />provided to serve the property to the east when it is <br />develc^^. <br />Councllmember Coettan recommended that the fact that the- <br />tennis court ia a non-conforming structure that does not <br />ateet the required setbacks be noted in the resolution. <br />Zoning Administrato* Mabusth stated it would be <br />incorporated in the final subdiviaion resolution. <br />Mr. Kroll noted that his name appeared incorrectly in <br />the drafted resolution. He also questioned the status <br />of the existing tennis court. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabt*^'- explained that the tennis <br />court is a non-conformi , structure which requires <br />variance approval to allow any improvements to the <br />structure. She noted that this would have been the case <br />even without this subdivaion action. <br />Councllmember Callahan asked staff about the best <br />alignment for the outlet extension. <br />&.f- <br />wfym' <br />-3- <br />f m <br />..y>: <br />iM-w \ <br />lii <br />4^ I <br />mm■J-:; ■m: <br />WM <br />m:si <br />ms <br />• ' V' . <br />mmmi <br />.V <br />E*; -...- 'V. :'' ;.;S^ <br />Am <br />f :■ <br />•' '■ ■■ XTi