Laserfiche WebLink
Sm M"::,VSSf ;••• . Jit- ■'••• .'•■ • " ■ <br />lELD <br />curred with staff's <br />lie regarding this matter <br />ed« <br />ided by Chairman Kelley# <br />n's interpretation that <br />:, that no variances are <br />;ed to no more than 1000 <br />back from the alley and <br />staff be Instructed to <br />tion# Ayes 7# Nays 0. <br />Id Certificate cf Mailing <br />r Gaffron explained the <br />permit and variance to <br />ate a walh-out basement <br />City Engineer Cook# per <br />I felt disruption of the <br />gative impact on Lake <br />ommend approval of the <br />B matter and stated the <br />was mainly to finish the <br />try and solve the water <br />he hydraulic pressure on <br />a letter from Engineer <br />le measures that would be <br />5n into the lake. <br />in favor of this because <br />ain reaction in this type <br />ipplication be table for <br />Rovegno. <br />r damage was a legitimate <br />(lie reqarding this matter <br />iod. <br />mmMm <br />m:.. <br />■ ■- <V-!• 'V-^-: j <br />;v' ■ <br />m <br />^&:y- <br />'v/Bmwh <br />y-:> yy <br />■!/?:* <br />).■ i . .yXmm. . :. .' V ••.•.•"'I <br />mmy--WM <br />0>C^- •p:-:-yr*;-^y <br />%■<*>i■**Sv Mfe..%■■:-^ySW .-Ji-; y>4 mi - ‘ • ..' ••... '':V:. ./. : •?.. /.; ■ • -.f;: ■•.■■ -y-Ia VJf • • V . :..":• • ; . .*.* : *• -.. .•}bm \dL^’ '^1^- <br />-•r <br />«imrrt» or tm rLARNxitc cohmissioh NncTiiic held j^aii u, istfi <br />m <br />■ ' . <br />BOSSS OOlIT <br />Xt was m«ved by Kovegno. secondedi by CoetieB, to table <br />i?i* applicant can provide additioral <br />bydraeli c/hydro logic infonsatioa for the City Engineer <br />i®i also review iepact on lake and <br />Mighter s properties# and neighbor's opinions. Notion# <br />Ayes 7# Mays 0, <br />•lOM Otmom ■. <br />mo imioob Av»<a <br />VASIAMCBroBLic nyyuM otoi - tt47 <br />fiMi Affidavit of Publieation and Certificate of Maltinoi was noted. - <br />I <br />Aeeistant losing Adeiniator Caffron explained the <br />hakdeover varianca requast to*construct a detached <br />garage (2.f% increase in hardcovar in the 75-250* froai <br />32.5% to 35.0%). Gaffron noted that applicant does not <br />"•J* •” exisitinq garage and proposes to ramova 2 <br />®*i*^i*'g storage sheda. He also noted that raaK>val of a <br />3rd existing shad would reduce the hardcover to 1.6% <br />incraese. Ha explained the grading work that would ba <br />conalating of approximately 90 cubic yards <br />irtilcn not require a conditional uaa panalts <br />Gordon Me Ison was present for this statter and stated <br />, *5 w* ^ ^ remove the 3rd shad also (resulting in a <br />1.6% hardcover Increase in the 75-250* - total 34.5%). <br />y'i <br />Goetten stated that she felt there was a real hardship <br />involved with the severe slopes of property. <br />w No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and tha public hearing was closed. <br />y0K,:- <br />* vdiiaitf?:'It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley# to <br />recomir :.nd approval of the variance# subject to a'*«ff's <br />hardship findings and conditions and subject to removal <br />of all 3 sheds and no additional hardcover will be <br />allowed. Motion# Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />m V=--.: <br />--mi <br />siSiSi^XviL- 'r":;-- .,:Vj <br />• • • • * •• • ; <br />:,Tvs ;; <br />p. w; ■ . <br />PillI <br />• . .•;.4 ” vV- . <br />y y:yy-^-yyyy <br />:4;;Vr U-. <br />mmy <br />:.'v- <br />mmy^11 <br />< • 'i-M <br />p ... <br />■ ■ . M- <br />y-yx-t-y <br />Ky-yyXy, <br />W'yyyy-i yH <br />y*’yxyyy:iy <br />• .'-V^ "> yv-'v.-v/rv" i:yy-riyi::->yyy - l-Mi\ -':• . * •*: ; : r^- <br />1?:' <br />!' ■■'■ 'h n <br />ill <br />.. ■ <br />V--" <br />diMm <br />mx: <br />■ •'J: >-VfS' <br />•■i. •/•: <br />E'vS'Sx'' ! <br />■'.y- ' ■m