Laserfiche WebLink
'mmwm^rnBmm:v^". -• ■ ■■ifj.lth^!’.--/" :V“r-I5- ' .::S';-:;;:v. <br />r • ^- ■ ^iWWnf^ ' •■■: <br />■; '7\.i ^ <br />mmM » <br />£R«fl <br />v,aRR ;•: ,,v -.a <br />-.a 'A <br />ma <br />"'■'■ ■■■ ■•“1 <br />SiiSl&iiPI <br />1 <br />.i.■■■■-.J i^rW!v :••.:■ «>.:.•■ ••.;.-w(i-ASS- :>:• ;■Jj...• '•k;• ■ . ■■. ■-. .■ -i_ *. • r=:S- <br />- V ■'SSA-S'Sjv> , <br />ri.vininp Corrission and Council Hank Mihich, Zoning Administrator <br />^te^ch 2. 1977 <br />t *k' ♦/ <br />SUBJTCT: Killian Odelen - 3450 North Shore Driw <br />Variance - Lot Area and Width - Proposed Addition to IK^llinn on <br />Non-Conforming Lot <br />This property consists of a dwelling with an area of 820 sq. ft. on a substandard <br />let. The owner is requesting approval of a 1,3*0 sq. ft. addition to the existing <br />house. The proposed acklition wevld meet all setback requirements. <br />Although the proposed addition would meet all setback requirements, the addition <br />appears quite large for this lot. The addition proposed along the east end of the <br />house practically extends into the private easement providing access from Parcels <br />4000 and 4400 to Coimty Road *51. I believe we should be careful that we don't <br />landlock the properties behind this parcel. <br />The variance request is as follows: <br />Requirements Existing Variance <br />Lot Area <br />Lot Width <br />43,560 sq. ft. <br />140 ft. <br />15,000 sq. ft. <br />75 ft. <br />28,560 sq. ft. <br />65 ft. <br />PIA'WING CCWISSION ^CETI^C • March 7, 1977 <br />Work Session item. After reviewing proposed addition. Planning Cemnission discoxered <br />that proposed addition would conflict with access easement to lakcshoxe lot (Parcel <br />4400). Connission instructed Zoning Administrator to inform applicant that sane <br />setback would be required from this easement to maintain access to this back <br />property. <br />PLVNING OTt'ISSIfTJ 'miNT; - 'la„;h 21, 197 <br />Planning Corrission tabled application in order for ?tr. 'Mdcn to resolxT the easeivnt <br />issue. <br />V I <br />STAFF - ftarch 22, 1977 <br />**r. <\lden call^ and inquired if the Planning Comission could at least consider the <br />proposed addition to the rear of the existing dwelling at tl>eir next meeting. The <br />rear addition docs not conflict with the setback requirement. <br />ST;\FF - March 23, 19 <br />Mr. Odden has requested another revision on his proposal. He wants to add a detached <br />garage (26 x 2S) to he located in* from the side lot line (where the existing ease­ <br />ment is located) and 10* from the rear lot line. A variance would he nocessarv. <br />K r- V-f <br />. ;^V/- ••: n: tv; ••77TTs« j <br />. i. - <br />■. ;v--.•••*;) <br />wm <br />* <br />mm <br />mm: <br />P: J»i®( i <br />»#‘:l <br />mm- <br />■v^y/r : : m <br />____r;, .. <br />mym-m?«!«»w-''^^yy;^ydyfc v,. ■■m:<y-y:.r -RC-y-y-yA'-iyjm: • - ''J Ua ■Z» ^m <br />mmm <br />p;: ■'Ki;:.' <br />yyM wM' <br />Pv':i <br />■■•'■■'a:-' . <br />'■:' -yy <br />A ';av::yy;y-r.V' <br />El:, r:;:: ■ <br />/ , R>..r <br />I* p"' ■ Si#??''■■■'■ k' <br />R Aia mm <br />IMsilii <br />■ -y::;=:;.^yyy--->py;^vyv^:. <br />.: .■■■' m.-.r . '» * R W •* ' <br />y: <br />fjkmk, -iy y' y • ■ <br />mmm <br />»y: <br />m‘\VI <br />to <br />I <br />Ml <br />c; <br />:cT <br />OQ <br />P <br />[Tm <br />tf <br />I <br />at <br />e <br />r <br />tJ <br />bj <br />o <br />rsi <br />PC' <br />■ ■ yy :: <br />pay yy.yyaa. <br />y.-' <br />a;;:;;.; <br />iy ■'■■ ^ a a.. .••— <br />: :a. j*. <br />^?R <br />a»-.- /" R <br />: av '• ,'r r <br />, . . :*' ■ •: '■ . R. <br />- :..-i r--:.r a <br />; • : ^ - <br />•*r R. :y:vR.-. <br />A •a... ::R:A-a=- . .:vaR >'- <br />■■ '■■ •■ -a: ..a,a'-a. •• <br />• . a /R <br />iliiR’':'a;;--'RRvigijBM <br />SyRR-'R^ <br />iilillR <br />r-.*'