Laserfiche WebLink
1 r •i <br />' ir* rOUTICIL ITEETHIG HELD JANUARY 12, 1976 <br />. fr. 11 wing variance* vould require approval! <br />Aren - 54,450 *q» <br />lot width - 25* <br />. Side "ntback ~ 15 <br />. Stre »ck - 33* <br />ho proposed location vould howoyar» mt tha <br />3* lakeshore setback requirs«*nt. <br />Page 7 <br />VARIANCE <br />1055 Weet Femdale Road <br />(Continued) <br />one conditions to be <br />cats and on-site disposal design, <br />anning Coneiisslon Meeting - December 3, 1975 <br />lie commission ®J hl*the <br />^plication due to the ®*“J?«,Sinonail sise o£ the lot, ^cauee <br />and was available and >>•«■«•» ,55?J5®?!rfolloving n single separate ownership provided the coiiowing <br />'ondltlons are nett <br />. Percolation tests meet approval o£ the <br />. The^b5lSng permit cite specific <br />restrictions on buildi^, ^reding and tree <br />removal and must be 75* from the <br />. In addition to the variances gog«**^*°»* <br />23% variance on hardcover be •*^®***®*_^_That the deck construction, as shown on tne <br />plan, within 75* of the lakeshow, <br />allowed provided it is of open <br />construction with rock beneath and that no <br />concrete be ueede <br />'Jr.nning Commission Meeting - January 5, 1976 <br />'''try's Construction Cos^ny presented a <br />nd drainage plan for the propem. The plan <br />ncluded swale* in the front yard area . <br />•’.vert drainage away from the }•**•• * ^-11 in the back lot area was Included fortte <br />r.rpose of diverting drainage •ff®** 2*® nto a natural ponding area on the other side o <br />ho street, instead of it flowing into we <br />Ujacent low area of a n«i9hboring property. »e <br />•3n stated that 35 truck loads of fill *'®®J® ®® <br />.-'oded on the whole site of which 5 <br />'uld be needed within the 75 lakeshore setback <br />n order to make a 25* taper from the house. <br />hey also noted that there used to be cabin* <br />“i the site and when they were talwn down We <br />-.tural drainage was destroyed. The C^lssiw <br />-'It that the retaining wall could be the neans <br />' blocking a natural ponding area. <br />(Continued) <br />y