Laserfiche WebLink
-t <br />f <br />Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission M«nbers <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Proas <br />Oates <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Hovesd>er 14» 1989 <br />Subjects #1470 Daniel Parten, 4300 Bayside Road > <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Rearing <br />Applieatioa - 3>lot Plat <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Memo from Applicants <br />Large Size Proposed Plat Drawings <br />Planning Commission Action Notice 10/20/89 <br />Memo & Exhibits of 10/10/89 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicants have met with staff and have attempted to <br />address Planning Commission's concerns with their revised <br />proposalr a 3-lot plat. This proposal results in three lots of <br />4.3f 4.4» and 6.0 acres respectively. They would bo served by a <br />50* private driveway outlot that connects to the Reiersgord <br />property to the east and to the Asao property on the northwest. <br />Each lot would meet the lot width standard as measured at <br />the 50' setback from the road outlot. Lots 2 and 3 would require <br />a lot area variance. <br />The applicants request that they not be requirea to pave any <br />portion of the road/driveway within the outlot. They propose to <br />construct an 18* wide gravel driveway to the turn-around area <br />(see Sheet 2 of the large scale site plan) and a 14' wide gravel <br />driveway to Lots 2 and 3. <br />Alternatives - <br />Please review the applicants' memo. They have considered <br />two alternatives to the proposal. Their Exhibit A indicates a <br />two lot plat excluding the northernmost parcel from the <br />subdivision^ wherein each lot would contain 5 acres# being served <br />by a 50' private driveway outlot. Under this scheme# they would <br />not be required to pave# and this would be considered as merely a <br />shared driveway. Such a proposal does not resolve any of the <br />concerns with surrounding properties and would likely make it <br />harder in the future for those access problems to be resolved <br />either by the City or by the affected property.owners.