Laserfiche WebLink
■•. ;:_-;;^?':3 • ^‘‘^lii-'- ■" ■-■ ^4®’■'■■'’ ■■' ■■'v'ffriIV■ ’* '~ '■: ’ •:*••■ ' ' •W*K . v-.l&v ;:: <br />Proposed <br />No Change <br />7,422 s.f. (29.3%) <br />No Change <br />.) <br />quare foot increase <br />,nt. The hardcover <br />Lthin planter areas, <br />B and steps, and <br />ea. The remaining <br />the garage leaves <br />3 a very functional <br />of hardship and the <br />s. The pie shaped <br />iqnificant impact on <br />ne (see Exhibit J). <br />proximately 133' in <br />a rectangular 1 acre <br />500' zone, where the <br />Lv from the normal <br />of Nadlers' 1 acre <br />lowable hardcover <br />d not be used by the <br />:hat the property has <br />reflects the removal <br />in 1977 when the new <br />he new additions are <br />Lsting house, is well <br />i' zone is relatively <br />justification ® <br />re is more area into <br />that the 1®90°® y®® <br />on of the existing <br />d not be a factor in <br />I#mmrn; <br />1 <br />psi*& j S <br />Zoning Pile 11464 <br />October 10, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff ITS Pf—snilsticm • <br />Staff would recommend approval of the average lakeshore <br />setback variance, based on the finding that no significant <br />encroachments on existing lake views enjoyed by neighboring <br />property owners will occur. <br />A Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the <br />hardcover variance to allow 29.3% hardcover in the 75-250' zone <br />where 29.1% now exists, could be justified by the fact that *teas <br />of hardcover on the lake sxJa of the house will be removed in <br />favor of additions on the street side of the house. An <br />additional supportive finding is the low percentage of 0-75' <br />hardcover and the relatively large area of the 0-75' zone. <br />Approval of the hardcover variance on this basis would generally <br />be consistent with past Planning Commission action in similar <br />situations. <br />•-V