Laserfiche WebLink
rVlUj:..!-■;■ -■ V ' '<'-i''-' -^- fr.; ' I^:.:t;mm§-ZVZm--relgh the positives in this IS are not met* The road ;hin the outlot due to the <br />cut or filled. The road <br />sld sites for Lot 2. The <br />an a separate outlot not <br />1 Sketch B looks good on <br />topography or physical <br />P7, suggests a planned <br />ch building site a 2+ acre <br />subdivision acreage as an <br />a be private road outlots. <br />»er than the standard 50' <br />■ve only two lots. <br />y applicant, staff would <br />>s be addressed for the <br />revised proposal more in <br />bs while still relating to <br />id: <br />: subdivision, or should it <br />»ent? <br />grant variances to allow <br />rather than private road <br />iqulred, should it continue <br />ler, should a private road <br />id Deters properties to the <br />iway crossing for those two <br />i necessary? <br />Lre that the alternate site <br />Les of Lot 1, if this is a <br />will Planning Commission <br />It 1 to be within the open <br />is a plat or a PRD, the <br />e the standard requirement <br />sd from lot area, if the <br />of roadways is less than <br />Sion consider granting of <br />vision? <br />uiiL pSl-- <br />t"r« <br />' rZ' <br />mZoning Pile #1470 October 10, 1989 Page 5 of 5AddltioBal Coamente -1. Applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for plat review. <br />2. Once a revised proposal has been received, further <br />review of drainage and other site concerns will commence. <br />W;SX\ <br />m 1?-; <br />li <br />•".Vw - <br />:Z Z ZZ,'■ <br />. <br />12 '<1 . <br />e’-S- ■■ z'--’- <br />-I' <br />i -V. V <br />■ ■ Z,'=Z'; ■ ■ . 'Z; ZZ'ZZ HZZ Z Z z Z ’ Z■Z Z:- ■.;■ zz:.z:zz Z":^Z.*Zv.zr:^Z <br />f ■' <br />z '-'/ # • <br />z- ■ ■ <br />-z-v. z _v. <br />zHji^lll^ <br />■% <br />K'z. <br />p V, 4p1 <br />f. -.^4^- - ; - ••' <br /><T>.V- <br />Sfei