Laserfiche WebLink
v^;\ • .V ■■■K ^•rMemo - Zoning File #1463 October 11» 1989 Page Two of Three <br />structure is required only from residential lot lines. <br />*"^*'cortVTp«J««'“«".ri.<:io,. of . remote .witch hullain, <br />mee.arlng 10 x 16 on a property owned by '^'3l?hin°'^the City of directly across County Road 19 within the ciry o <br />i!S!;«?l.te. V;^ remote .witch building meet, the '•equlred <br />Street setback of 35' but does not meet the required 50?«rthradjece„ re.identi.l lot line, (refer to the finding. <br />noted above and Exhibit M). <br />Hardships have not been submitted with the application, but <br />ADolicant advised that because of the narrow width of the lot the <br />residential 50' setback could never be maintained from <br />and south lot line unless structure was moved to the rear of the <br />property. Yn addition, applicant not.. i* VoJJd <br />So.? mid po.ition in th. wlda.t area of the <br />prevent the Church from expanding a Parki""?<-h#» lot If applicant moves structure to the soutn <br />property <br />Please review Mr. McCurdy's letter. Applicant fhould be <br />eSi«?oJ of so^nd emitting from the scSSd <br />freauencv of use of these cooling units. Is * , <br />b??rl.r wall that could b. con.id.r.d out.id. of normal <br />plantings? <br />The lease agreement refers to various further improvements <br />???t?rrthV ^^t^hrilirng o7 p7o*p“.rty.'’*s"tIf?“o°uld <br />suggest that any furth.r improvements on ‘'I*. <br />Sublet to th. Church filing a separate •PP“«“°" “‘7i,7?ula? <br />?i\7.7"t°lh?'u?7h'ir w'.”?a7n{t ^d^^^ <br />p?oU““Vucr:f b7.h«Ll“7ofp ?n7Ulo*or"°^^^ <br />E“i^rtr wL%V int?r^™? l7prl???^n7a E’' Sin^^i'/'to 7?following conditions must be met if application is to be <br />approved : <br />■;'f.