Laserfiche WebLink
’tea*a-■■ v :a-te':- ■* -Miwmgv'’te^v;-tetev.:k ••: •..mcmmrn ■ "V-, -(p>‘Ileyrsng & Zoning Administratorheasant Road - <br />lakeshore residential» <br />variance to construct <br />sd Additions <br />s-existing) <br />setback variance of <br />ruct an attached garage <br />9,1' proposed). Also <br />!S would bo some dormers r <br />and residing. Permits <br />the work wl'ich do not <br />. One alternative to \ <br />the width of the garage <br />h. <br />tiouse is not sguare with <br />ariance request would not <br />he neighboring adjacent <br />e, leaving a separation <br />neighboring structure of <br />, house suggests that <br />ie to that structure in <br />3 width but further from <br />inate the access door <br />sm-miA-m <br />vf <br />M <br />:.te-:tete| <br />;.' i ^ ■ <br />i ■■■■ ■. <br />• ::■:. :l •.• <br />m.m-n1 yy;\m-m <br />• • V-* : <br />:^';te| <br />te^;* <br />mm <br />' ^ V ,, <br />"• <br />Zoning File #1454 September 13, 1989 Page 2 of 2Staff Raeonmendation -Planning Commission could recommend approval °‘J'setback variance based on the finding that the house isnot square with the lot which creates a hardship. will notfinding would be that granting of the 0.9' variwce will notcause excessive visual density in the .neighboring residence is more than 20' from the lot line. <br />^««« » V — *4 <br />=tev'teTrte te ■ '^■= <br />\y ’. : ^te.-. V\' <br />5'te* <br />i\ <br />tetssiasgi <br />iKin: <br />• i ^ ‘ " •'•’■. ■ *•*. i*.' <br />Jir*.l: -; . ■ " .•.••■.• ;‘-V ; A;, • <br />-V 'vy^^-y-y : <br />■■ml... \ :V :> <br />* <br />Vte <br />mmifer-tete^^‘■te^:'' <br />I