Laserfiche WebLink
m•:>*.’^Ov-^v ‘‘11T^- .i-nr- C -i;:aii:;iiicalts E and <br />\ proposed <br />r typical <br />llcant has <br />nstructlon <br />ing for a <br />it or under <br />nt. Staff <br />definition <br />Lcation of <br />view those <br />concerning <br />dor to make <br />have been <br />Lty of the <br />Note the <br />St corner, <br />h and west <br />ope. The <br />b from the <br />: 1 drain <br />ert in the <br />of Lot Ir <br />nds to the <br />to the <br />plicant and <br />Review for <br />anger would <br />il burden on <br />wooded area <br />landing area, <br />replacement <br />al road Is <br />ropertles to <br />reenlng from <br />line. <br />wmm'• - ■ ■ ■■■• ’ i ■ ■r- ■ - ■ ■iKV-.- -.i. ';- ,Himmmmm <br />mmmM <br />Mmmmm <br />V 4* ' ^ '5, <br />sn m."^’sW- <br />■‘S- <br />mm^ <br />0'-m <br />mmp <br />r ,,Vsl <br />Ma-m <br />=,■*••• ;iy-. <br />B'v v ;■ r <br />Zoning File #1457 Septesiber 15» 1989 Page 5 of 8 '■;v'.^■4 v^a:“■••• • '..' - •:i, ■i^'■v d mmmm:::; ■- v:i, •..•:v,.v;.-a.5--.. Mi, ■fe..„Il :-v-H^..; -;=; -1^.The nature of the wetlands has changed over tho 30 years <br />since it was originally designated as a «I«h <br />Mature trees new occupy what was once f. <br />land. There la no obvious sign of flooding or retention o <br />flood waters as a ditching system has dried out the area and <br />allowed the trees to flourish. <br />Applicant is not asking for J^®‘5®*^9n®tlon of wetlands for <br />building sites and septic development only tc be allowed to <br />construct a roadway. <br />Ron Quambeck of the MCWD has advised thAt because the road <br />sutoitta’i information to the watershed district. Mr. J*® <br />advised that he will recommend tabling the <br />recelot of revised plans and additional information about the <br />Interior drainigrplan. He also noted that the Board may approve <br />subject to receipt of the additional information. <br />Roads/Future Access - <br />City will ask for detailed plans of the cltv <br />construction through the wetlands area. In addition, ^"e City <br />would ask for appropriate sizing of a culvert <br />encroached by the private driveway serving 2. Once g <br />staff would note that the access corridor to Lot 7, Block 2 is <br />located below the 970' elevation. Lot 1, and Lot 8, <br />Block 2 shall be served by a private driveway <br />road connection to the eastern properties. <br />the future east/west corridor 454* from the north boundary of the <br />property. Review Exhibit M. It is the intent of the ®PPl^®®"^ <br />to meet the City's planning "®.®^® P/?Thethe east/west roadway connectir g to ®®y <br />proposed access ceriidor would now connect with the <br />portion of the cul-de-sac roadway. A portion ^®‘^ <br />will be located within the treed area of the ^e 7 wetland. It <br />would be the City's position that a variance is not <br />the 2100' length cul-de-sac road as a future extension acces <br />corridor is provided to the east* <br />V ^ : - '-M <br />....i:’- . .::J : jj <br />V‘ <br />Um